2006
DOI: 10.1080/00309230600552120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Genealogy of an Australian System of Comprehensive High Schools: The Contribution of Educational Progressivism to the One Best Form of Universal Secondary Education (1900–1940)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A substantial body of research exists on the impact of the NEF, its version of progressive education and the role of its international conferences in aiding the circulation of their ideas and ideals within and beyond Europe (Jenkins 2000, Brehony 2004, Fuchs 2004, Godfrey 2004, Campbell and Sherington 2006. This scholarship forms part of the backdrop to the discussion here.…”
Section: Education For Complete Living 1937mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A substantial body of research exists on the impact of the NEF, its version of progressive education and the role of its international conferences in aiding the circulation of their ideas and ideals within and beyond Europe (Jenkins 2000, Brehony 2004, Fuchs 2004, Godfrey 2004, Campbell and Sherington 2006. This scholarship forms part of the backdrop to the discussion here.…”
Section: Education For Complete Living 1937mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is despite the hardships and often devastating effects of the Great Depression, perhaps especially though by no means exclusively with regard to women teachers (Seddon, 1988), and also increasing fiscal stringencies across the various school systems. Campbell and Sherington (2006) indicate that the period was the beginning of the second of two phases of 'intensive educational reform discourse and activity … in the first half of the twentieth century'. One occurred at the turn of the new century, while the other was more drawn out and intermittent, with 'many of the ideas broached in the 1930s and 1940s only receiv [ing] implementation in the 1950s and 1960s' (Campbell & Sherington, 2006, pp.…”
Section: Reading (Pedagogy) In Australiamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It might therefore well be asked When was the New Education? Campbell and Sherington (2006) argue a connection between the innovation of the comprehensive high school and what they term “[e]ducational progressivism” (p. 193), or “twentieth century educational progressive thought” (p. 192). They point in particular to two waves of reform and what might be called consciousness-raising in the first half of the twentieth century, in Australia, noting first” the contribution of the New Education early in the century”, and second “the kinds of progressivism advocated by the New Educational Fellowship a little later in the century” (Campbell and Sherington, 2006, p. 193).…”
Section: The New Education – and Its Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%