Proceedings of the 31st Spring Conference on Computer Graphics 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2788539.2788541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general framework for constrained mesh parameterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constrained by the piecewise-linear representation of the solution, boundary-fixed parameterization is far from the actual conformal demand. For more details on constrained mesh parameterization, please refer to the literature [36]. Thus further exploration on boundary-free has been carried on as follows.…”
Section: Background Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constrained by the piecewise-linear representation of the solution, boundary-fixed parameterization is far from the actual conformal demand. For more details on constrained mesh parameterization, please refer to the literature [36]. Thus further exploration on boundary-free has been carried on as follows.…”
Section: Background Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global parameterization (flattening) of complex 3D triangular meshes is an ill-posed problem. New parameterization techniques have been developed to align mesh curves and regions with prescribed geometric entities [84]. We also studied an important area of combinatorial geometry.…”
Section: Computer-aided Geometric Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower limb kinetics can be estimated based on musculoskeletal models and ground force plates using inverse dynamics (Carbone et al, 2012;Galloway et al, 2012;Vaitkus and Várady, 2015;Bagwell et al, 2016). These techniques do not often account for patient-specific variability as they use scaled generic models (Worsley et al, 2011;Vaitkus and Várady, 2015), while it was already widely shown that the geometry of the musculoskeletal models is very sensitive to muscle force predictions (Carbone et al, 2012). In addition, and to the authors knowledge, the available studies merely consider very limited population samples which may not be representative of the total variability of the lower limb anatomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%