2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general indirect representation for optimization of generative design systems by genetic algorithms: Application to a shape grammar-based design system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in shape grammar design variations are generated by synthesizing different features into the initial design with the aid of geometric rules, which ensure the creation of feasible shapes [19]. Some common applications of shape grammars are architectural design [23], 2D automotive design [24], embroidery design [25], and wheel shapes with the integration of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) [26]. L-systems [27] are a variation of shape grammars, and utilize a set of production rules based on string rewriting mechanisms to formalize design alternatives.…”
Section: Generative Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in shape grammar design variations are generated by synthesizing different features into the initial design with the aid of geometric rules, which ensure the creation of feasible shapes [19]. Some common applications of shape grammars are architectural design [23], 2D automotive design [24], embroidery design [25], and wheel shapes with the integration of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) [26]. L-systems [27] are a variation of shape grammars, and utilize a set of production rules based on string rewriting mechanisms to formalize design alternatives.…”
Section: Generative Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shape grammars are a successful and popular tool for modelling the 3D textual features of building facades in video games [16]. They have also been used to generate floor plans [17][18][19], but their success in this area is limited to particular styles that do not reflect typical modern-day architecture.…”
Section: Previous Approaches To Automating Architectural Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms require a lot of time to achieve an optimal solution because they are searching from a single point and attempting to collect much information [1]. Traditional algorithms, such as Hill climbing, Simulated Annealing (SA), and Random Search, and then, metaheuristic algorithms have been used to solve complex optimization problems [2]. However, these algorithms also have some deficiencies in terms of finding global optima due to having different constraints in real-world applications, namely, engineering design problems [3], task planning problems, and economical problems [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%