2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-0427(03)00378-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalization of the continuous Euler transformation and its application to numerical quadrature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, we applied the formula to the computations of integrals of the Hankel transform type. In relation to integrals of the Hankel transform type, we also remark that Ooura and Mori have presented DE-type formulae for oscillatory functions with slow decay [5,6,7] in addition to their first DE-type formula for Fourier integrals [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, we applied the formula to the computations of integrals of the Hankel transform type. In relation to integrals of the Hankel transform type, we also remark that Ooura and Mori have presented DE-type formulae for oscillatory functions with slow decay [5,6,7] in addition to their first DE-type formula for Fourier integrals [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. (17) where in the first column and is the best approximation of , given the partial sums . In the original version of the WA method [19], the remainders are expanded into infinite series using integration by parts, which is truncated for numerical purposes (18) where (19) The weights obtained in this way, although different, are asymptotically equivalent to those in (15).…”
Section: A Partition-extrapolation Methods Involving Wa Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the direct application of the formulas (24)- (25) using as default the maximal number of points (160, corresponding to 10 iterations with a quadrature order of 16) can be implemented in MATLAB as a simple matrix multiplication, which is very convenient and indeed leads to lower computational time than the iterative procedure proposed in [18], while resulting in the same accuracy for the final results. Under these assumptions, the DE transformation needs, approximately 5 times less computational time than the two other methods, as can be seen from weights (15)- (16) involved in the Mosig-Michalski WA technique are very easy to evaluate, but the method calls for the recursion (17). On the other hand, the evaluation of the weights (21) involved in new WA algorithm is more complex, since it calls for the computation of the binomial coefficients.…”
Section: B De Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This formula, however, has some restriction for the setting of the range, and direct application of the FFT to the formula is not straightforward. On the other hand, Ooura [8] [9] proposed other useful formulas…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%