2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized activation energy equation for torrefaction of hardwood biomasses based on isoconversional methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, from this comparison, it can be inferred that agricultural biomass, such as: raw OPFP, showed higher Eα values of 239.03 kJ/mol (Table 3), as compared to woody biomass, which is agreeable to the current results obtained. An increase of Eα values during Stage 1 was also expected where according to Grigiante et al [31], this is due to the random scission of linear chain in hemicellulose which led to the rise in Eα values as the thermal heating progressed. The crosslinking behavior and its effects on the numerously branched polymeric structure of hemicellulose and extractives constituents that yet to be degraded, gave rise to the Eα values upon thermal heating.…”
Section: Model-free Kinetic Evaluation Via Kas Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, from this comparison, it can be inferred that agricultural biomass, such as: raw OPFP, showed higher Eα values of 239.03 kJ/mol (Table 3), as compared to woody biomass, which is agreeable to the current results obtained. An increase of Eα values during Stage 1 was also expected where according to Grigiante et al [31], this is due to the random scission of linear chain in hemicellulose which led to the rise in Eα values as the thermal heating progressed. The crosslinking behavior and its effects on the numerously branched polymeric structure of hemicellulose and extractives constituents that yet to be degraded, gave rise to the Eα values upon thermal heating.…”
Section: Model-free Kinetic Evaluation Via Kas Methodssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Average Eα values are noticeably high in ROPFP (239-251 kJ/mol) in which, based on the literatures on various agricultural residues kinetic studies, Ea calculated for various types of biomass are as follows; rice straw (140-267 kJ/mol) [26], rice husk (168 kJ/mol) [28], olive pomace (162-602 kJ/mol) [29], bagasse (169 kJ/mol) [28], and olive tree pruning (151-209 kJ/mol) [30]. Whereas, from previous studies on woody biomass of different categories (softwood/hardwood) showed lower Eα values via various non-isothermal kinetic methods, for example; ashwood-hardwood (133-167 kJ/mol) [31], poplar wood (159 kJ/mol) [32], Ahun wood (127 kJ/mol) and Araba wood (125 kJ/mol) [33]. Therefore, from this comparison, it can be inferred that agricultural biomass, such as: raw OPFP, showed higher Eα values of 239.03 kJ/mol (Table 3), as compared to woody biomass, which is agreeable to the current results obtained.…”
Section: Model-free Kinetic Evaluation Via Kas Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Thus, the positive correlation between the contents of H and the HHV presented in the Section 3.3 (r = 0.43), which is according to Ref. [42][43][44]. However, there are authors who argue that the component that most influences HHV values is C, e.g., [19,24,25,30].…”
Section: Elemental Analysis (Chons) and Ashesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…A slight variability in the calorific value can be witnessed and occurs due to certain variability in the elementary H content. It also occurs as a result of a much larger variability in ash contents [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%