2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized finite-difference time-domain scheme for solving nonlinear Schrödinger equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the derivatives in space are approximated using higher-order finite difference methods. The G-FDTD has been successfully applied for solving both linear and nonlinear Schrödinger equations [51,52].…”
Section: B Exciton-polariton Bec Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the derivatives in space are approximated using higher-order finite difference methods. The G-FDTD has been successfully applied for solving both linear and nonlinear Schrödinger equations [51,52].…”
Section: B Exciton-polariton Bec Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the potential is time-dependent, the time step will be limited by the speed of potential variation [39], thus, greatly reducing the efficiency of this technique. In addition, there are also many other approaches based on the above FDTD methods for further modifications [17][18][19][20]. are the source of EM fields.…”
Section: One-step Chebyshev Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With FDTD-Q method, the time behavior of the wave function for the quantum well wire (QWW) was obtained, and the analysis of stability and convergence of this method was also carried out [16]. Besides, there are also many modified methods proposed with better performance [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of a time-stepping scheme is of utmost importance. For uniform grids, a condition on the time step is generally derived by a Von Neumann analysis, where the grid is implicitly assumed infinite and the potential constant [7,8,13,20,21]. This approach was further verified for the Schrödinger equation in [6], where a more rigorous criterion was determined by explicitly allowing the potential to vary.…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%