2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejc.2008.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized recurrence for Bell polynomials: An alternate approach to Spivey and Gould–Quaintance formulas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, they extended these results to ordinary single variable Bell polynomials. Independently from Gould and Quaintance, Belbachir and Mihoubi [1] also obtained the same identity (15) in [11] and their proof follows a different approach. More recently, by using Faà di Bruno's formula [9,12] for higher order derivatives of composite functions, Xu and Cen [22] obtained some recurrence sequences including the Bell polynomials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, they extended these results to ordinary single variable Bell polynomials. Independently from Gould and Quaintance, Belbachir and Mihoubi [1] also obtained the same identity (15) in [11] and their proof follows a different approach. More recently, by using Faà di Bruno's formula [9,12] for higher order derivatives of composite functions, Xu and Cen [22] obtained some recurrence sequences including the Bell polynomials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This new formula includes both (1) and (2) as special cases and Spivey's proof was combinatorial. Gould and Quaintance [11] provided a generating function proof of Spivey's result and used Spivey's formula to obtain a new formula for B n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…and gives it a simple combinatorial proof. This recurrence has been generalized by Belbachir and Mihoubi [1], Gould and Quaintance [9]. We also have a similar formula for A n+k,k .…”
Section: Proof By Lemma 21 One Hasmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Suppose that the cells are ( ), ( ) and [ ]. The partitions of the set [3] such that each cell contains at most 2 elements are listed below.…”
Section: Mixed Restricted Partition Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%