2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00362-009-0240-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized skew two-piece skew-normal distribution

Abstract: Skew-normal distribution, Generalized skew-normal distribution, Two-piece skew-normal distribution, Generalized two-piece skew-normal distribution, Generalized skew two-piece skew-normal distribution, Unimodality and bimodality, Orthant probability,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A generalised two‐piece skew normal distribution was introduced by Jamalizadeh et al (), through a standard bivariate normal distribution with correlation ρ . The density in this case is given by fδ,λ,ρfalse(yfalse)=cfalse(δ,λ,ρfalse)ϕ()yμnormalΦ2()δfalse(yμfalse),λfalse|yμfalse|,ρ,2emδ,λ,ydouble-struckR, where cfalse(δ,λ,ρfalse)=false(4πfalse){}cos1()false(ρ+δλfalse)1+δ21+λ2+cos1()false(ρδλfalse)1+δ21+λ2+2tan1false(λfalse)1 and Φ 2 (.,.…”
Section: Quantile‐based Asymmetric Normal Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A generalised two‐piece skew normal distribution was introduced by Jamalizadeh et al (), through a standard bivariate normal distribution with correlation ρ . The density in this case is given by fδ,λ,ρfalse(yfalse)=cfalse(δ,λ,ρfalse)ϕ()yμnormalΦ2()δfalse(yμfalse),λfalse|yμfalse|,ρ,2emδ,λ,ydouble-struckR, where cfalse(δ,λ,ρfalse)=false(4πfalse){}cos1()false(ρ+δλfalse)1+δ21+λ2+cos1()false(ρδλfalse)1+δ21+λ2+2tan1false(λfalse)1 and Φ 2 (.,.…”
Section: Quantile‐based Asymmetric Normal Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data was collected at the Australian Institute of Sport. It has been previously used and analyzed by (Jamalizadeh et al, 2011;Choudhury and Abdul Matin, 2011;Al-Aqtash et al, 2014). The data is as follows: 148.9, 149.0, 156.0, 156.9, 157.9, 158.9, 162.0, 162.0, 162.5, 163.0, 163.9, 165.0, 166.1, 166.7, 167.3, 167.9, 168.0, 168.6, 169.1, 169.8, 169.9, 170.0, 170.0, 170.3, 170.8, 171.1, 171.4, 171.4, 171.6, 171.7, 172.0, 172.2, 172.3, 172.5, 172.6, 172.7, 173.0, 173.3, 173.3, 173.5, 173.6, 173.7, 173.8, 174.0, 174.0, 174.0, 174.1, 174.1, 174.4, 175.0, 175.0, 175.0, 175.3, 175.6, 176.0, 176.0, 176.0, 176.0, 176.8, 177.0, 177.3, 177.3, 177.5, 177.5, 177.8, 177.9, 178.0, 178.2, 178.7, 178.9, 179.3, 179.5, 179.6, 179.6, 179.7, 179.7, 179.8, 179.9, 180.2, 180.2, 180.5, 180.5, 180.9, 181.0, 181.3, 182.1, 182.7, 183.0, 183.3, 183.3, 184.6, 184.7, 185.0, 185.2, 186.2, 186.3, 188.7, 189.7, 193.4, 195.9. The data is summarized in Table 3 and the performances of the competing distributions are given in Table 4.…”
Section: Data Set Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jamalizadeh et al (2011) used the heights for the 100 female athletes and the hemoglobin concentration levels for the 202 athletes to illustrate the application of a generalized skew two-piece skew-normal distribution. Choudhury and Abdul Matin (2011) also used percentage of the hemoglobin blood cell for the male athletes to illustrate the application of an extended skew 216 generalized normal distribution.…”
Section: Australian Athletes' Datamentioning
confidence: 99%