“…The data was collected at the Australian Institute of Sport. It has been previously used and analyzed by (Jamalizadeh et al, 2011;Choudhury and Abdul Matin, 2011;Al-Aqtash et al, 2014). The data is as follows: 148.9, 149.0, 156.0, 156.9, 157.9, 158.9, 162.0, 162.0, 162.5, 163.0, 163.9, 165.0, 166.1, 166.7, 167.3, 167.9, 168.0, 168.6, 169.1, 169.8, 169.9, 170.0, 170.0, 170.3, 170.8, 171.1, 171.4, 171.4, 171.6, 171.7, 172.0, 172.2, 172.3, 172.5, 172.6, 172.7, 173.0, 173.3, 173.3, 173.5, 173.6, 173.7, 173.8, 174.0, 174.0, 174.0, 174.1, 174.1, 174.4, 175.0, 175.0, 175.0, 175.3, 175.6, 176.0, 176.0, 176.0, 176.0, 176.8, 177.0, 177.3, 177.3, 177.5, 177.5, 177.8, 177.9, 178.0, 178.2, 178.7, 178.9, 179.3, 179.5, 179.6, 179.6, 179.7, 179.7, 179.8, 179.9, 180.2, 180.2, 180.5, 180.5, 180.9, 181.0, 181.3, 182.1, 182.7, 183.0, 183.3, 183.3, 184.6, 184.7, 185.0, 185.2, 186.2, 186.3, 188.7, 189.7, 193.4, 195.9. The data is summarized in Table 3 and the performances of the competing distributions are given in Table 4.…”