2010
DOI: 10.4102/abc.v40i1.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generic classification of the Restioneae (Restionaceae), southern Africa

Abstract: We propose a new generic classification of the African Restionaceae. tribe Restioneae (subfamily Restionoideae). based on the phylogeny and on extensive morphological data. The phylogeny is based on both plastid sequence data and morphological data. We delimit the genera to be monophyletic, to minimize the nomenclatural changes, and to maximize the ability to diagnose the genera. We recognize eight genera, one of w hich w ith nine subgenera, in the tribe. O f the currently accepted genera, only three need chan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There a phylogeny based on comprehensive sequencing of atpB-rbcL, trnL-F and trnK, together with morphological features, covered 317 species of Restionaceae (Hardy & al., 2008). In revising the generic classification in response to their phylogenetic findings, Linder & Hardy (2010) state that their classification "represents our attempt to optimize our adherence to the following criteria; 1, monophyly; 2, diagnosability; 3, nomenclatural stability; and 4, informativeness". Their classification recognises one new genus but greatly enlarges the limits of Restio, synonymising within it three formerly recognised genera.…”
Section: Characterising An Enlarged Restionaceae and Subfam-mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There a phylogeny based on comprehensive sequencing of atpB-rbcL, trnL-F and trnK, together with morphological features, covered 317 species of Restionaceae (Hardy & al., 2008). In revising the generic classification in response to their phylogenetic findings, Linder & Hardy (2010) state that their classification "represents our attempt to optimize our adherence to the following criteria; 1, monophyly; 2, diagnosability; 3, nomenclatural stability; and 4, informativeness". Their classification recognises one new genus but greatly enlarges the limits of Restio, synonymising within it three formerly recognised genera.…”
Section: Characterising An Enlarged Restionaceae and Subfam-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restionaceae (currently 47 genera [but expected to be reduced to 42, as indicated below], about 456 species) is in southern Africa and Australasia with one species each in Madagascar, coastal Chile and from Malesia to Hainan Island (Briggs, 2001). (Numbers of genera and species recognised are from Briggs & Linder, 2009, modified to take account of Linder & Hardy, 2010;Briggs & al., 2012;Wagstaff & Clarkson, 2012. ) Within Restionaceae three subfamilies are recognised (Briggs & Linder, 2009), supported principally by DNA-based phylogenies Linder & al., 2003Moline & Linder, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The South African Restionaceae (restiads) represent one of the largest (>300 species) and most intensely studied plant radiations of southern Africa (Linder ; Hardy et al . ; Linder & Hardy ). These reed‐like graminoids form ecologically important elements of the hyperdiverse fynbos biome of the CFR (Goldblatt & Manning ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well‐developed phylogeny for Restionaceae (Hardy et al . ; Linder & Hardy ; Litsios et al . ), available knowledge on their physiological and phenological responses to water logging and drought (Araya et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%