1998
DOI: 10.1118/1.598249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generic off-axis energy correction for linac photon beam dosimetry

Abstract: Cooperative clinical trial group protocols frequently require off-axis point dose calculations. The Radiological Physics Center uses the calculative technique developed by Hanson et al. [Med. Phys. 7, 145-146 (1980); 7, 147-150 (1980)] to verify these calculations. In order to correct for off-axis energy changes, this technique requires off-axis half-value layer data, HVL, as a function of off-axis ray angle for the specific beam. This paper presents a formulism based on HVL mesurements on a limited number of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead the off‐axis softening is calculated based on generic data. The work presented by Tailor et al 20 . is used and this is a fit to a number of accelerators where it should be possible to improve dose calculations off‐axis by applying machine specific measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead the off‐axis softening is calculated based on generic data. The work presented by Tailor et al 20 . is used and this is a fit to a number of accelerators where it should be possible to improve dose calculations off‐axis by applying machine specific measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of mean energy is also displayed as the lateral variation of HVL in figure 6 together with the generic fit from Tailor et al (1998) Tailor et al (1998).…”
Section: Mean Energy Hvlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7,14,15 This wedge factor is used in MU calculations in the case of linear accelerators to compensate for the reduction in beam transmission caused by the wedge. A normalized wedge factor (NWF) was introduced to circumvent the large differences between WF for different field sizes/depth.…”
Section: Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%