2016 IEEE/ACS 13th International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/aiccsa.2016.7945661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genetic algorithm feature selection based approach for Arabic Sentiment Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In ASA, N-grams models have been largely used as features. Some studies exposed that unigrams resulted in a better performance than bigrams and trigrams [35,54]. is behavior was due to the fact that BOW can give a good data coverage, whereas bigrams and trigrams tend to be very sparse.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Research Avenuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In ASA, N-grams models have been largely used as features. Some studies exposed that unigrams resulted in a better performance than bigrams and trigrams [35,54]. is behavior was due to the fact that BOW can give a good data coverage, whereas bigrams and trigrams tend to be very sparse.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Research Avenuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preprocessing [17] Normalization, POS tagging [24][25][26][27] Stemming [28][29][30][31][32][33] Text cleaning [34][35][36][37][38][39] Normalization, stemming, stop words removal [40][41][42] Text cleaning, normalization, stemming, stop words removal [43][44][45] Normalization Text cleaning, normalization, tokenization, stemming, stop words removal [49][50][51][52] Normalization, tokenization [53,54] Text cleaning, normalization, tokenization [55,56] Normalization, tokenization, POS tagging [13,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] Normalization, tokenization, stemming, stop words removal [65,66] Normalization, tokenization, stemming, lemmatization [67,68] Text cleaning, normalization, tokenization, stemming [69] Text cleaning, tokenization, stemming, negation detection [70]…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have presented several methods and models to tackle Arabic SA based on three major approaches, namely, machine learning (ML) [36,37], semantic orientation [38,39], and hybrid approach [40]. In this research, we focus on the studies that employ the ML approach, specifically deep learning methods, which have been increasingly utilized in the past decade.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, researchers in the eld of Arabic language SA are somewhat hampered by a relative shortage of resources, even though there are about 219 million Arabic internet users. Moreover, the application of SA to Arabic language text is relatively more complicated for a number of reasons, including the diversity of dialects that are used in each Arabic-speaking country or even region or city, as well as the limitations of existing resources and tools such as stemmers that are more suitable for use with Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), whereas most Arabic internet users prefer to give their opinions in microblogging and social media websites in their own dialects (Aliane, Aliane, Ziane, & Bensaou, 2016). This research aims to suggest new methodologies help in solving text mining and SA problems especially on the Arabic language, therefore, new approaches are presented in order to get more accurate results within a reasonable time and to make these approaches applicable to any dataset regardless to its domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%