2020
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.19.0411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genome-wide association study of reproduction traits in four pig populations with different genetic backgrounds

Abstract: Objective: Genome-wide association study and two meta-analysis based on GWAS performed to explore the genetic mechanism underlying variation in pig number born alive (NBA) and total number born (TNB). Methods: Single trait GWAS and two meta-analysis (single-trait meta analysis and multitrait meta analysis) were used in our study for NBA and TNB on 3,121 Yorkshires from 4 populations, including three different American Yorkshire populations (n = 2,247) and one British Yorkshire populations (n = 874). Results: T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, GLDC, IFT57, AHI1, CACNA1C, GFER, RAB35, and PXN were previously associated with the regulation of the embryonic development (Diagne et al, 2003;Valente et al, 2006;Kaneko et al, 2008;Todd et al, 2010;Narisawa et al, 2012;Fukuyama et al, 2014;Thevenon et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2019;Strand et al, 2020). Interestingly, among the functional candidate genes, KDM4C, SYNJ2, DISC1, SLC9A3R2, TSC2, SIRT4, CYP7A1, and ACADM are associated with abortion, bad pregnancy outcomes, and early live death in different species (McConkie-Rosell and Iafolla, 1993;Glantz et al, 2004;Jablensky et al, 2005;Maier et al, 2005;Lappas et al, 2011;Lipina et al, 2013;Moscovitz et al, 2016;Lim et al, 2016;Sankar et al, 2017;Krieg et al, 2018;Kazmi et al, 2019;Jiang et al, 2020;Zhao et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, GLDC, IFT57, AHI1, CACNA1C, GFER, RAB35, and PXN were previously associated with the regulation of the embryonic development (Diagne et al, 2003;Valente et al, 2006;Kaneko et al, 2008;Todd et al, 2010;Narisawa et al, 2012;Fukuyama et al, 2014;Thevenon et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2019;Strand et al, 2020). Interestingly, among the functional candidate genes, KDM4C, SYNJ2, DISC1, SLC9A3R2, TSC2, SIRT4, CYP7A1, and ACADM are associated with abortion, bad pregnancy outcomes, and early live death in different species (McConkie-Rosell and Iafolla, 1993;Glantz et al, 2004;Jablensky et al, 2005;Maier et al, 2005;Lappas et al, 2011;Lipina et al, 2013;Moscovitz et al, 2016;Lim et al, 2016;Sankar et al, 2017;Krieg et al, 2018;Kazmi et al, 2019;Jiang et al, 2020;Zhao et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, the meta-analysis improved the power of detection for SNPs by combining different populations. The advantage of meta-analyses has been reported in pigs [ 10 , 33 , 34 ]. In our study, we detected novel significant SNPs in the meta-analysis compared with single-breed analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have emerged as an efficient method for dissecting the genetic mechanisms of complex traits. Recently, GWAS have been widely employed to identify the candidate genes on traits in pigs, such as growth [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], reproduction [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], meat quality [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], and disease resistance [ 16 , 17 ]. The variant detection power of GWAS is affected by marker density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For complex traits, such as BFT, CLP and CFP, large-scale analysis is necessary to detect trait-associated SNPs. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) [13] represents a powerful approach to correlate SNPs and functional genes with quantitative traits, and has been widely applied in important economic traits of pigs, including carcass [14][15][16][17][18][19], meat quality [14,15,19,20], growth [15,21], immunity [22], and reproductive traits [23]. For species with larger genomes, such as pigs, the cost of GWAS using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is still high at present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%