2014
DOI: 10.1080/10573569.2013.818908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Genre-Specific Reading Comprehension Strategy to Enhance Struggling Fifth-Grade Readers' Ability to Critically Analyze Argumentative Text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this stage, it was possible to perceive the increase of students' confidence since the re-writing stage. Previous studies by Haria (2011) and Lubawski and Sheehan (2010) described the increasing confidence in students and teachers as one positive effect of the implementation of GBA and the enlargement of critical thinking in students.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this stage, it was possible to perceive the increase of students' confidence since the re-writing stage. Previous studies by Haria (2011) and Lubawski and Sheehan (2010) described the increasing confidence in students and teachers as one positive effect of the implementation of GBA and the enlargement of critical thinking in students.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Studies were excluded if the researcher(s) did not provide the statistics necessary to calculate a weighted effect size or if results were summarized over multiple age groups, such that it was impossible to calculate effect sizes for grades 4–6 exclusively, even after contacting those authors. Correlational and qualitative studies were excluded, as well as studies with a within‐subjects design or a multiple‐baseline design (e.g., Haria & Midgette, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed argument schema highlights the most crucial elements of argumentation, including position, reasons for the position, supporting facts as well as an objection, and response to it. To comprehend an argumentative text, a reader needs not only to identify the claim and reasons for and against it but also to be aware of the author's intention, the author's position on the issue, the context of the argumentation, and the reader's own understanding of the issue (Haria & Midgette, 2014). For example, in persuasive texts, authors' intention is to change readers' beliefs on a controversial issue (Iordanou et al, 2016).…”
Section: Multimodal Argumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%