2008 10th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icarcv.2008.4795829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geometrical inverse kinematics method for hyper-redundant manipulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been numerous studies about hyper-redundant manipulator, including kinematics and dynamics [11], inverse kinematics [12] and path planning [13] studies. However, the proposed coupled tendon-driven mechanism imposes a highly coupled interaction between each joint torque unlike previous studies [4] [7].…”
Section: Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been numerous studies about hyper-redundant manipulator, including kinematics and dynamics [11], inverse kinematics [12] and path planning [13] studies. However, the proposed coupled tendon-driven mechanism imposes a highly coupled interaction between each joint torque unlike previous studies [4] [7].…”
Section: Control Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar solutions of three sequential rotations with dimensions of (3 × 3) (Rz, Ry, R-z) (where positive rotations are clockwise) can be seen in refs. [19] and [21]. The difference between these approaches and the proposed method is the use of homogenous matrices and the proposed equations.…”
Section: Kinematic Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this optimization, the distance between the end-effector and the target is constrained, leading to solutions of low accuracy. A geometric method for solving the equations pertaining to a planar hyper-redundant manipulator has been proposed by; 19 however, this approach fails for backbones with more than one DoF in each disc, while some solutions result in errors due to the redundancy in the system. Also, closed form solutions for continuum robots composed of a continuously bendable backbone have been proposed; 20 however, the method is presented as a singlesection solution and no information was provided about the errors produced in multiple sections for desired vs. calculated trajectories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yahya et al proposed a geometric method to find the optimal solution of inverse kinematics of redundant or hyper-redundant robots from infinite solutions. 16 Ananthanarayanan and Ordóñez took the analytical solution as the initial value and iteratively solved the objective function to obtain the solution of inverse kinematics. 17 Modern intelligent algorithms are widely used to solve inverse kinematics of robots with complex structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%