2013 IEEE Power &Amp; Energy Society General Meeting 2013
DOI: 10.1109/pesmg.2013.6673061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geometrical view for multiple gross errors detection, identification, and correction in power system state estimation

Abstract: In this paper it is described a geometrical approach to detect, identify, and recover multiple gross errors in power system state estimation. Using the classical WLS estimator the measurement residuals is computed, and then the error is composed. For the detection and identification of the measurements with gross errors the composed measurement error in the normalized for (CMEN) is used. The measurement magnitude corrections otherwise are performed using the composed normalized measurement error (CNE). To give… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later on, the authors of [33] expand upon the chi‐square test, using the normalised residual within the test itself and showed significant improvement. Another significant improvement upon the chi‐square test came along when the geometrical interpretation of the measurement residuals was explored [34]. With this geometrical view of the PSSE process, it was discovered that errors and residuals were in different mathematical spaces.…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later on, the authors of [33] expand upon the chi‐square test, using the normalised residual within the test itself and showed significant improvement. Another significant improvement upon the chi‐square test came along when the geometrical interpretation of the measurement residuals was explored [34]. With this geometrical view of the PSSE process, it was discovered that errors and residuals were in different mathematical spaces.…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the error, one needs also toestimate the error component εU. With that purpose, the innovation of ameasurement, related to the other measurements, is defined as the information itcontains, and not the others measurements of the measurement set [23]. This definition suggests that theinnovation is contained in the portion of the measurement that is independent ofthe other measurements of the system, i.e.…”
Section: State Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the residual εD and the other error component εU are orthogonal to each other, it ispossible to compose the ME vector; that is, for the i thmeasurement εi2=εnormalUi2+εnormalDi2 This error vector is called composed ME. To find the maskederror and compose the measurement's total error, it is used the innovation index(II), as proposed by [23] normalIIi=∥∥εDi∥∥εUi=1Pi,iPi,i A measurement with low II indicates that a large component ofits error is not reflected in its residual as obtained by the classical WLS‐SE.Consequently, even when those measurements have gross errors, their residualswill be relatively small. Knowing that the vector spaces normalℜ)(H and normalℜbold-italicH are orthogonal to each other, then it ispossible to recalculate the composed error of the i thmeasurement.…”
Section: State Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the measurements can have important deviations from real values, it is important to include a bad data detection procedure in a state estimation method. There are several mathematical methods to detect presence of bad data [11, 12]. Considering its simplicity, in this work this task is performed by the χ 2 ‐test [13, 14].…”
Section: State Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%