2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A giant tree stand in the West Carpathians—An exception or a relic of formerly widespread mountain European forests?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
44
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Diameter distributions of dead trees in the three stands studied efficiency of space utilisation (about 1.5 higher in the conifers than in beech), the differences identified in stand basal area (between 36.1 and 38.4 m 2 /ha) seem surprisingly small. That is, instead of the expected association between increasing conifer partition and increasing stand volume (Korpel' 1993;Holeksa et al 2009), this Explanation: given random distribution, a value of 0 is expected. Values higher than 1 indicate a significant deviation towards aggregated patterns; values lower than -1 indicate a significant deviation towards regular patterns at the 0.05 significance level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 Diameter distributions of dead trees in the three stands studied efficiency of space utilisation (about 1.5 higher in the conifers than in beech), the differences identified in stand basal area (between 36.1 and 38.4 m 2 /ha) seem surprisingly small. That is, instead of the expected association between increasing conifer partition and increasing stand volume (Korpel' 1993;Holeksa et al 2009), this Explanation: given random distribution, a value of 0 is expected. Values higher than 1 indicate a significant deviation towards aggregated patterns; values lower than -1 indicate a significant deviation towards regular patterns at the 0.05 significance level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4 Empirical frequency distributions of the differentiation index (VAR h ) for the sample plots 0.015 ha in area and the fitted model (a, b). The empirical diameter distributions from these small plots were then used to simulate the frequency distributions of VAR h on plots of different areas (c, d) and to estimate the variation in VAR h dependent on plot area (e) Eur J Forest Res (2015) 134:235-246 243 National Park (Dziewolski 1991), Vyhorlatský prales reserve (Drössler 2006), Oszast reserve (Holeksa et al 2009), Gorce National Park (Przybylska et al 1995), and Salajka reserve (Vyskot 1968). Admittedly, some authors have reported higher stand volume levels between 550 and 850 m 3 /ha (see Holeksa et al 2009;Motta et al 2011), but these results were obtained in a wide range of geographic locations (Albania, Czech Republic, Italy, Slovakia, Slovenia, Ukraine), the measurements represented different sized areas, and both site conditions and the proportion of tree species in the stands differed substantially (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NNR Hrončecký Grúň, from the viewpoint of its reproductive characteristics and species composition, represents a unique ecosystem in European conditions. European ash, sycamore maple and wych elm reach there the top of their growth possibilities (Holeksa et al 2009). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such structure is typical for natural forests occurring on the very diverse bedrock from the point of view of lithological patterns. Site conditions make this natural forest stand out among others occurring in middle Europe (Holeksa et al 2009). …”
Section: Fig 4: Distribution Of Mingling Index (Dmi) Values (Left) Amentioning
confidence: 99%