2015
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2015.2481322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Global Analysis of Light and Charge Yields in Liquid Xenon

Abstract: Abstract-We present an updated model of light and charge yields from nuclear recoils in liquid xenon with a simultaneously constrained parameter set. A global analysis is performed using measurements of electron and photon yields compiled from all available historical data, as well as measurements of the ratio of the two. These data sweep over energies from 1 -300 keV and external applied electric fields from 0 -4060 V/cm. The model is constrained by constructing global cost functions and using a simulated ann… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
146
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
146
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the bottom panel of Fig. 1, the medians and widths of the NR data were compared to those obtained from the NEST-1.0 NR model [13] with detector parameters (PDE, EEE, SEG, and DPF) taken into account, and a good agree-3 ment is observed. The distributions in S1 and S2 were also compared to the MC, a small discrepancy was observed in detailed shape for small S1 and S2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the bottom panel of Fig. 1, the medians and widths of the NR data were compared to those obtained from the NEST-1.0 NR model [13] with detector parameters (PDE, EEE, SEG, and DPF) taken into account, and a good agree-3 ment is observed. The distributions in S1 and S2 were also compared to the MC, a small discrepancy was observed in detailed shape for small S1 and S2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The AmBe calibration was carried out inbetween the dark matter running periods. A full Monte Carlo (MC) simulation based on Geant4 [10, 11] (v10.2) including neutron-gamma correlated emission from the source, detailed detector geometry, neutron propagation in and interactions with the detector (following the recommended physics list [12]), and S1-S2 signal production (NEST-1.0-based [13]) was developed to compare to the data. According to the simulation, less than 10% of the low energy events are contaminated with multiple scattering in the dead region ("neutron-X").…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) The production of both Vacuum Ultra-Violet (VUV) scintillation photons and thermal ionization electrons. This is modeled with the Noble Element Simulation Technique (NEST) [38,39] formalism, a frequently updated semiempirical collection of models based on past detectors' calibration data. The number of such photons and electrons that are generated is in general anticorrelated and depends on the interacting particle type, the magnitude of the electric drift field, and the energies of the recoils.…”
Section: Simulations: Luxsim a Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1 and S2 are then generated via standard statistical distributions which model stages of detector response (collection of scintillation photons, attenuation of the ionization signal before S2 production, photoelectron and SE distributions). The full model is described in [15] and the fit procedure follows [26]. An alternate parametrization of L (E) by Bezrukov et al [27] is similarly consistent with calibration data and implies higher signal efficiency at low energies; it is shown for reference but does not enter into the reported limit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%