2022
DOI: 10.1002/joc.7566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global climate model ensemble for downscaled monthly climate normals over North America

Abstract: Use of downscaled global climate model projections is expanding rapidly as climate change vulnerability assessments and adaptation planning become mainstream in many sectors. Many climate change impact analyses use climate model projections downscaled at very high spatial resolution (~1km) but very low temporal resolution (20-to 30-year normals). These applications have model selection priorities that are distinct from analyses at high temporal resolution. Here, we select a 13-model CMIP6 ensemble and an 8-mod… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each climate scenario, temperature values were based on an ensemble of 13 ESMs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) designed for robust downscaling of monthly climate normals (2081 to 2100). These 13 selected ESMs are representative of the distribution of equilibrium climate sensitivity, which include ACCESS-ESM1-5, BCC-CSM2-MR, CNRM-ESM2-1, CanESM5, EC-Earth3, GFDL-ESM4, GISS-E2-1-G, INM-CM5-0, IPSL-CM6A-LR, MIROC6, MPI-ESM1-2-HR, MRI-ESM2-0, and UKESM1-0-LL ( 54 , 76 ). A preliminary analysis showed that monthly temperature projections from the mean of the 13-model ensemble had the least difference from observed historical temperature for the central PPR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each climate scenario, temperature values were based on an ensemble of 13 ESMs from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) designed for robust downscaling of monthly climate normals (2081 to 2100). These 13 selected ESMs are representative of the distribution of equilibrium climate sensitivity, which include ACCESS-ESM1-5, BCC-CSM2-MR, CNRM-ESM2-1, CanESM5, EC-Earth3, GFDL-ESM4, GISS-E2-1-G, INM-CM5-0, IPSL-CM6A-LR, MIROC6, MPI-ESM1-2-HR, MRI-ESM2-0, and UKESM1-0-LL ( 54 , 76 ). A preliminary analysis showed that monthly temperature projections from the mean of the 13-model ensemble had the least difference from observed historical temperature for the central PPR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained climate data from the AdaptWest database (AdaptWest Project, 2021; Mahony et al, 2022; Wang et al, 2016) for climate variables for the current (1991–2020) and future (2071–2100) time periods. We used data for future climate scenario (CMIP6) associated with shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) to examine the degree to which habitat suitability differed under these alternative pathways.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested by edge detection theory (Dakos et al 2012), the strength and direction the monthly correlation coefficients may also be interpreted as an indicator of the risk of threshold transgressions at the level of species assemblages (Trisos et al 2020), which are of particular interest to resource managers and conservationists (Millar and Stephenson 2015). A formal analysis of threats due to threshold transgressions would require inclusion of climate change projections, but given average ensembles of CMIP6 projections that project warmer and drier conditions for the Southwest (Mahony et al 2022), climate limitations from this analysis suggest that tree populations in this region are highly vulnerable to continued future declines. This has also already been documented based on past climate change trends over the last several decades (e.g.…”
Section: Implications and Management Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%