2019
DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-18-0052.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Global Climatology of Extratropical Transition. Part II: Statistical Performance of the Cyclone Phase Space

Abstract: This study analyzes the differences between an objective, automated identification of tropical cyclones (TCs) that undergo extratropical transition (ET), and the designation of ET determined subjectively by human forecasters in best track data in all basins globally. The objective identification of ET is based on the cyclone phase space (CPS), calculated from the Japanese 55-yr Reanalysis (JRA-55) or the ECMWF interim reanalysis (ERA-Interim). The resulting classification into ET storms and non-ET storms under… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Bieli et al (, ), ET is defined as follows: ET onset is the first time a TC is either asymmetric ( B > 11) or has a cold core ( VTL<0 and VTU<0), and ET completion is when the second criterion is met. Bieli et al (, ) also require a minimum wind speed of 34 kt (≈17.5 m/s; tropical storm intensity) for ET onset in order to prevent weak, thermally asymmetric tropical depression‐like systems or monsoonal troughs from being incorrectly diagnosed as beginning ET events. Based on the objectively determined relationship between tropical storm intensity and model resolution given in Walsh et al (), the minimum wind speed for the onset of ET in FLOR‐FA is set to 16.5 m/s, as this is approximately the equivalent intensity of a tropical storm in a model with 50‐km horizontal resolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Bieli et al (, ), ET is defined as follows: ET onset is the first time a TC is either asymmetric ( B > 11) or has a cold core ( VTL<0 and VTU<0), and ET completion is when the second criterion is met. Bieli et al (, ) also require a minimum wind speed of 34 kt (≈17.5 m/s; tropical storm intensity) for ET onset in order to prevent weak, thermally asymmetric tropical depression‐like systems or monsoonal troughs from being incorrectly diagnosed as beginning ET events. Based on the objectively determined relationship between tropical storm intensity and model resolution given in Walsh et al (), the minimum wind speed for the onset of ET in FLOR‐FA is set to 16.5 m/s, as this is approximately the equivalent intensity of a tropical storm in a model with 50‐km horizontal resolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCs undergoing ET are identified by means of their trajectories through the cyclone phase space (CPS Hart, ), calculated from global climate model output. The CPS has become widely used and has been applied to diagnose ET in operational analysis and reanalysis data (e.g., Bieli et al, , ; Hart, ; Kitabatake, ; Wood & Ritchie, ) as well as climate model output (Liu et al, , ; Zarzycki et al, ). We use the Forecast‐oriented Low Ocean Resolution version of CM2.5 with Flux Adjustment (FLOR‐FA), which was developed at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding these limitations, recent studies have assessed the changes of ET in a warmer climate using the cyclone phase space of Hart [119] as the classification standard of ET [120]. For warmer climate scenarios, it is expected that the number of TCs undergoing ET will increase over the North Atlantic [121][122][123] partly due to spatial shifts in TC genesis locations [123].…”
Section: Extratropical Transition Of Tropical Cyclonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. ET timing errors of the operational model (at lead time 0 h), the hazard model, and the CPS analysis in Bieli et al (2019b), which was performed using JRA-55 as well as ERA-Interim data. Timing errors (shown on the x axis) are defined as the differences between the predicted ET times and the true (i.e., best track) ET times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance scores for the classifications into ET storms and non-ET storms obtained from the operational model (at lead time 0 h), the hazard model, and from the CPS analysis inBieli et al (2019b), which was performed using JRA-55 as well as ERA-Interim data. The table shows the F1 score (F1) and the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) for the North Atlantic (NAT) and western North Pacific (WNP) basins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%