2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2023.107036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global lithospheric magnetic field model between ± 65° latitude derived from CSES satellite scalar data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To map and characterize magnetic anomalies over China and surroundings, we selected four lithospheric magnetic field models, the MF7 (Maus et al, 2008), the CM6 (Sabaka et al, 2020), the CHAOS-7 (Finlay et al, 2020) /LCS-1 (Olsen et al, 2017) and the CSES (Wang J et al, 2023b) models, all of which are derived from satellite data alone, without near-surface (aeromagnetic or marine) data, which means that the long-wavelength magnetic anomalies decay slowly. Table 1 presents brief descriptions of the four models.…”
Section: Lithospheric Magnetic Field Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To map and characterize magnetic anomalies over China and surroundings, we selected four lithospheric magnetic field models, the MF7 (Maus et al, 2008), the CM6 (Sabaka et al, 2020), the CHAOS-7 (Finlay et al, 2020) /LCS-1 (Olsen et al, 2017) and the CSES (Wang J et al, 2023b) models, all of which are derived from satellite data alone, without near-surface (aeromagnetic or marine) data, which means that the long-wavelength magnetic anomalies decay slowly. Table 1 presents brief descriptions of the four models.…”
Section: Lithospheric Magnetic Field Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CSES model (Wang J et al, 2023b) is a global lithospheric magnetic field model between ±65° latitude for degrees 16-42; it was derived from CSES scalar magnetic data collected only from March 2018 to November 2022 (see https://www.leos.ac.cn/#/article/info/250 for model coefficients). Compared with the CHAOS-7, CM6, and MF7 models, CSES shows good agreement in terms of power spectra and anomaly details.…”
Section: Lithospheric Magnetic Field Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%