2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.11.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GM-CSF/CD40L Producing Cell Augments Anti-tumor T Cell Responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a murine model, in vivo delivery of an activating anti-CD40 antibody has been reported to overcome the immunosuppressive mechanism of tumours and support specific T-cell priming [33]. Similarly, we have previously reported that a bystander cell line expressing CD40 ligand promotes a specific anti-tumour T-cell response in vitro [14]. CD40 ligand has also been shown to inhibit tumour-induced apoptosis of DC [34,35] as well as tumour-secreted IL-10-mediated abrogation of DC function [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a murine model, in vivo delivery of an activating anti-CD40 antibody has been reported to overcome the immunosuppressive mechanism of tumours and support specific T-cell priming [33]. Similarly, we have previously reported that a bystander cell line expressing CD40 ligand promotes a specific anti-tumour T-cell response in vitro [14]. CD40 ligand has also been shown to inhibit tumour-induced apoptosis of DC [34,35] as well as tumour-secreted IL-10-mediated abrogation of DC function [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The ligation of CD40 induces full maturation of DC, including the up-regulation of surface molecules requisite for the complete stimulation and activation of T cells [12,13]. Our laboratory has previously demonstrated that DC cultured with a bystander cell line engineered to express CD40 ligand display a mature phenotype and the bystander line promotes specific anti-tumour T-cell responses in vitro [14]. Based on this knowledge, we tested an agonist antibody specific for CD40 (CP-870,893) for its ability to promote anti-tumour immune responses through the DC activation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,20 The combination of GM-CSF-based cancer vaccines with other immunostimulatory factors is under development in order to enhance the anti-tumor response induced by GM-CSF. Some of these factors include CD40L 21 or TLR-ligands e.g. CpG 22 that stimulate activation of dendritic cell (DC) or anti-cytotoxic T-cell (CTL)A4 that can inhibit the induction of immune suppression.…”
Section: Increased Numbers Of Cd11bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to biosafety concerns, this genetic modification method is preferable over a retroviral infection approach because retroviral infection involves risks of development of competent recombinant retroviral particles in vivo. K562-hGM-CSF cells secreted approximately 3000 ng per 10 6 cells every 24 h, which is higher than previously reported values that range from 42 to 1403 ng per 10 6 cells every 24 h. 19,22,41,42,44,45,47 Although the GM-CSF threshold for an effective immunostimulation effect has been evaluated to be 36 ng per 10 6 cells every 24 h, 48 there are no clearly defined values reported for the site of cell injection. On the other hand, Serafini et al 49 reported that a high-dose of GM-CSF could impair the immune response through the recruitment of myeloid suppressor cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…10,15,19,[21][22][23][41][42][43] The inability to obtain reproducible levels of the cytokine, and the labor-intensive requirements for individualized genetic engineering, led to the development of allogeneic bystander cells for the local delivery of GM-CSF, such as the K562 human erythroleukemia cell line. [44][45][46] However, despite their undetectable expression of human leukocyte antigen class I and II, the high sensitivity of allogeneic K562 cells to natural killer cytotoxicity prevented continuous release of the cytokine for several days. In this context, the encapsulation technology has the advantage of allowing a sustained release of the cytokine at the implantation site by the allogeneic cells being physically isolated from the host immune response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%