2011
DOI: 10.3328/tl.2011.03.01.63-75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GPS-based bicycle route choice model for San Francisco, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
203
6
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
16
203
6
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Several researchers have used GPS to document bicycle travel routes and speeds (Dill and Gliebe 2008;Hood et al 2011). Data from GPS units can be reviewed by survey participants during follow-up interviews to correct preliminary route and mode information (Dill and Gliebe 2008).…”
Section: Considerations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have used GPS to document bicycle travel routes and speeds (Dill and Gliebe 2008;Hood et al 2011). Data from GPS units can be reviewed by survey participants during follow-up interviews to correct preliminary route and mode information (Dill and Gliebe 2008).…”
Section: Considerations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of GPS data in transportation modeling includes: generation of trip rate correction factors (Wolf et al 2003a;Bricka and Bhat 2006), travel mode detection (Tsui and Shalaby 2006;Reddy et al 2010;Widhalm et al 2012), trip end/activity location detection (Wolf et al 2001;Stopher et al 2005;Ashbrook and Starner 2003), assessment of transportation network conditions (Hackney 2005;Stopher and Swann 2007), and route choice analysis (Jan et al 2000;Li et al 2005;Hood et al 2011;Quddus et al 2003). GPS traces can provide accurate spatial and temporal information of individuals, but generally the attainable sample size and observation period of GPS-assisted surveys are still limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies on cyclist route choice (revealed preference research) suggest that distance and travel time are the most important factors (Broach et al, 2012;Gommers and Bovy, 1987;Menghini et al, 2010). Moreover, cyclists balance their total journey length and route directness meaning that cyclists aim to reduce the number of turns (Broach et al, 2012;Hood et al, 2011;Raford et al, 2007). Revealed preference studies also report a preference for routes along roads with low motor traffic volumes, standalone bicycle tracks, bicycle lanes and separated bicycle paths, although their contribution to decision making is less important than distance and time (Broach et al, 2012;Gommers and Bovy, 1987;Howard and Burns, 2001;Menghini et al, 2010).…”
Section: Effects Of Bicycle Lanes and Paths On Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%