2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GPU-accelerated package for simulation of flow in nanoporous source rocks with many-body dissipative particle dynamics

Abstract: Mesoscopic simulations of hydrocarbon flow in source shales are challenging, in part due to the heterogeneous shale pores with sizes ranging from a few nanometers to a few micrometers. Additionally, the sub-continuum fluid-fluid and fluid-solid interactions in nano-to micro-scale shale pores, which are physically and chemically sophisticated, must be captured. To address those challenges, we present a GPU-accelerated package for simulation of flow in nano-to micro-pore networks with a many-body dissipative par… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the complexity of the model and/or the objectives of the studied problem, the scale and features of the simulated model may vary from nanometers to centimeters. Various computational models, such as molecular dynamics (MD) 22,23 , direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) 24 , dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) 25,26 , Lattice Boltzmann (LB) 27,28 , and many continuum-flow-based models, have been used for simulations of fluid flow in shales to calculate their permeability. The main deference between these simulations lies in the size of the modeled system and the type of fluid flow they are capable of modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the complexity of the model and/or the objectives of the studied problem, the scale and features of the simulated model may vary from nanometers to centimeters. Various computational models, such as molecular dynamics (MD) 22,23 , direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) 24 , dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) 25,26 , Lattice Boltzmann (LB) 27,28 , and many continuum-flow-based models, have been used for simulations of fluid flow in shales to calculate their permeability. The main deference between these simulations lies in the size of the modeled system and the type of fluid flow they are capable of modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…www.nature.com/scientificreports/ fluid flow and transport phenomena, motivates the need for developing novel geo-architected materials suited for more sophisticated experiments to validate fluid flow models recently developed by numerus research groups [14][15][16][17] . There is considerable evidence that the known laws of adsorption, reaction, phase transitions, and flow behavior are affected by the presence of fluids confined in porous materials with nanometer-sized pores 18,19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the average of Q loss in the k pairs as the predicted Q loss in the current time interval. In our evaluation, we use different values for k, but find that k ∈ [4,6] is usually sufficient to give accurate prediction, hence we choose k = 4 to reduce runtime overhead.…”
Section: Prediction Of Simulation Quality Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluid simulation aims to study the flow of fluid materials and has been widely applied to multiple disciplines such as chemical physics and material science [1][2][3]. However, the simulation of fluid dynamics usually requires prohibitively high computational resources [4,5] and thus limits its application in the related fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%