2020
DOI: 10.3390/w12030637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GPU-Accelerated Shallow-Water Scheme for Surface Runoff Simulations

Abstract: The capability of a GPU-parallelized numerical scheme to perform accurate and fast simulations of surface runoff in watersheds, exploiting high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs), was investigated. The numerical computations were carried out by using an explicit finite volume numerical scheme and adopting a recent type of grid called Block-Uniform Quadtree (BUQ), capable of exploiting the computational power of GPUs with negligible overhead. Moreover, stability and zero mass error were ensured, even in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generally high values of the roughness coefficient obtained in the three case studies are far from the values extensively used for hydraulic purposes in flood routing [40], but are within the range of values generally found in the literature for hydrological purposes [26,30,31,42,[88][89][90][91], especially for hillslopes and flood plains, where the rainfallrunoff process predominates.…”
Section: On the Roughness Coefficient Values And Their Effect On The Hydrological Responsementioning
confidence: 55%
“…The generally high values of the roughness coefficient obtained in the three case studies are far from the values extensively used for hydraulic purposes in flood routing [40], but are within the range of values generally found in the literature for hydrological purposes [26,30,31,42,[88][89][90][91], especially for hillslopes and flood plains, where the rainfallrunoff process predominates.…”
Section: On the Roughness Coefficient Values And Their Effect On The Hydrological Responsementioning
confidence: 55%
“…Moreover, the code is developed in the compute unified device architecture (CUDA) environment, which enables parallel computing on graphics processing units (GPUs), leading to a drastic reduction in runtimes (of about two orders of magnitude) compared to serial codes, even for domains of several million cells [39]. The good performances of the PARFLOOD model in both simulations of theoretical cases and practical applications over complex bathymetries are well documented in previous works [11,34,[58][59][60][61][62], to which the reader is referred for further details.…”
Section: Hydraulic Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For the river beds, in the absence of data for calibration, a value of the Strickler's roughness coefficient of 25 m 1/3 s −1 was assumed based on local inspections, literature suggestions [65], and previous studies conducted by the authors concerning neighboring watersheds with similar characteristics [62]. Moreover, this value allowed the reproduction of, at best, the numerical rating curve previously obtained at Saliceto through 1D hydraulic modeling.…”
Section: Domain Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nogherotto et al [19] described an integrated hydrological, and hydraulic approach based on the river discharges estimated through the hydrological model CHyM and on the CA2D hydraulic model to calculate the flow over a digital elevation model. More recently, Aureli et al [20] solved the complete 2D SW Equations starting from the precipitations and simulating the propagation on structured non-uniform grids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%