1983
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.1983.4767394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Gradient Projection Algorithm for Relaxation Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above iteration equation is only one of many choices. A detailed implementation of such a projection operator used in is described in (Mohammed et al 1983). GP is an extended steepest descent procedure for solving programming problems under linear constraints.…”
Section: Maxirnization Forrnulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above iteration equation is only one of many choices. A detailed implementation of such a projection operator used in is described in (Mohammed et al 1983). GP is an extended steepest descent procedure for solving programming problems under linear constraints.…”
Section: Maxirnization Forrnulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It implies that except for the boundary of K K, the gradient ascent procedure stays always inside the space and thus requires no projection. In other words, the projection operation Å K K , which otherwise may become much more complicated [33], reduces to…”
Section: A Relaxation Network For Texture Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this problem, Rosenfeld et al (1976) formulated probabilistic relaxation. Much of the work involving consistent labelling has adopted Hummel and Zucker's optimization paradigm Faugeras and Berthod, 1981;Lloyd, 1983;Mohammed et al, 1983;Wilson and Hancock, 1997). The problem is to nd a set of label assignments that optimizes some global consistency measure.…”
Section: Consistent Labellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the update operator is required to monotonically increase the quality of the solution: this was the approach used by Hummel and Zucker (1983) and others (Hancock and Kittler, 1990a;Faugeras and Berthod, 1981;Lloyd, 1983;Mohammed et al, 1983;Wilson and Hancock, 1997). Gradient ascent is appropriate when an initial guess can be made, which is close to the nal solution in the sense that there are no intervening local optima.…”
Section: Consistent Labellingmentioning
confidence: 99%