2015
DOI: 10.1515/9781614519003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Grammar and Lexicon of Yintyingka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 lists all possible stress patterns for bisyllabic and trisyllabic roots in Umpithamu, which as mentioned earlier together make up over 90 per cent of the lexicon. Stress is morphologically insensitive (unlike in Umpithamu's closest relative Yintyingka, see Verstraete & Rigsby 2015), so the patterns below are not influenced by suffixation, except in occasional instances of lexicalisation of suffixed forms. The relevant surface factors governing these stress patterns are the presence of an onset, the length of the first vowel, and the size of the root.…”
Section: Basicsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 3 lists all possible stress patterns for bisyllabic and trisyllabic roots in Umpithamu, which as mentioned earlier together make up over 90 per cent of the lexicon. Stress is morphologically insensitive (unlike in Umpithamu's closest relative Yintyingka, see Verstraete & Rigsby 2015), so the patterns below are not influenced by suffixation, except in occasional instances of lexicalisation of suffixed forms. The relevant surface factors governing these stress patterns are the presence of an onset, the length of the first vowel, and the size of the root.…”
Section: Basicsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There are definitely other languages with partial initial loss in the region (see Alpher 1976, who coined the term 'sporadic initial dropping' for them), but none have a sufficiently detailed analysis of their stress system to compare with Umpithamu. The best candidate is probably Yintyingka (Verstraete & Rigsby 2015), which has a relatively small percentage of vowel-initial roots (13%, versus 40% in Umpithamu), which seem to originate in borrowing rather than any internal phonetic process (as argued in Verstraete forthcoming). Interestingly, however, what can be reconstructed of the stress system looks like that of Umpithamu, with an apparent righthand generalisation (see patterns in Verstraete & Rigsby 2015, though the right-hand analysis is not spelt out there).…”
Section: Umpithamu Stress Shift In a Broader Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there are plenty of examples when the latter count fewer “languages” than the people themselves, for example, Di Carlo (2016) and Di Carlo et al (2019) with seven to eight versus 13 for Lower Fungom, Lüpke (2018) with 15 versus ca. 30 for Casamance in Senegal, Verstraete and Rigsby (2015, p. 10, p. 14) with one versus four in Australia or Khanina (2021) with five versus six in Siberia.…”
Section: Ideologies Of Small-scale Multilingualismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“….]) and not owned” (Verstraete & Rigsby, 2015, p. 11). In the Piraparaná region of Upper Rio Negro, people “speak” their patrilect but only “imitate” other languages (Gomez-Imbert, 1991, p. 543).…”
Section: Ideologies Of Small-scale Multilingualismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I have long been struck by the use of the term ‘(bush) murri ’ to refer to unfamiliar Aboriginal people, this usage implicitly suggesting someone likely to be engaged in sorcery (cf. Verstraete & Rigsby, : 344 on wapa , a person engaged in sorcery, glossed by Umpila‐speakers as ‘bush man, wild man’). Murri is a loan word from more southerly Aboriginal languages used across Queensland, meaning simply ‘Aboriginal person’.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%