2021
DOI: 10.1049/ell2.12176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A greedy non‐hierarchical grey wolf optimizer for real‐world optimization

Abstract: Grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm is a new emerging algorithm that is based on the social hierarchy of grey wolves as well as their hunting and cooperation strategies. Introduced in 2014, this algorithm has been used by a large number of researchers and designers, such that the number of citations to the original paper exceeded many other algorithms. In a recent study by Niu et al., one of the main drawbacks of this algorithm for optimizing real-world problems was introduced. In summary, they showed that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.4. Shapley Values.The SHAP technique is based on the Shapley value principle from the game theory[53,54]. The Shapley value (SHAP) principle was developed to anticipate the relevance of an individual player in a cooperative team.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.4. Shapley Values.The SHAP technique is based on the Shapley value principle from the game theory[53,54]. The Shapley value (SHAP) principle was developed to anticipate the relevance of an individual player in a cooperative team.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, this mechanism has a crucial disadvantage in optimizing some real-world problems, i.e ., the algorithm converges rapidly but to a locally optimal solution. To overcome these drawbacks in the GWO, the G-NHGWO algorithm ( Akbari, Rahimnejad & Gadsden, 2021 ), the best personal optimal solution for the -th grey wolf, has been established and stored, like in the PSO algorithm. Then, three members, , , and , with individual best positions, respectively , , and , are selected randomly and utilized to lead the population to update the new positions as Eqs.…”
Section: The Proposed Hde Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the GWO algorithm, , , and wolves always participate in the hunting phase. Therefore, using the positions of the best wolves in the hunting phase increases the quality of the exploration and accelerates the convergence of the GWO method ( Akbari, Rahimnejad & Gadsden, 2021 ). Since one of the main problems of the DE is the low convergence speed, in this study, the hunting phase of GWO is proposed as an auxiliary mutation vector to the DE to accelerate the convergence rate and achieve more optimal solutions.…”
Section: The Proposed Hde Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further validate the effectiveness of the REGWO. The performances of different GWO variants are compared, and the benchmark functions ( f 1 ∼ f 31 ) are solved by REGWO, WGWO [ 35 ], DGWO [ 59 ], AGWO [ 60 ], IGWO [ 61 ], RLGWO [ 62 ], and GNHGWO [ 63 ]. To make a fair comparison, the 6 algorithms use the same parameter settings as their original literature.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%