2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.01.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Grey Box Software Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Composed Manufacturing Processes: A Hybrid Manufacturing Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The guidelines of this standard allow for the collection of relevant data to identify the process according to the sustainability criteria established by the standard. The analysis is carried out following criteria such as resource efficiency, waste management, and emission reduction, among others [107]. The sustainability requirements of each stage of the process are reflected in matrix form in Table 4.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sustainability Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guidelines of this standard allow for the collection of relevant data to identify the process according to the sustainability criteria established by the standard. The analysis is carried out following criteria such as resource efficiency, waste management, and emission reduction, among others [107]. The sustainability requirements of each stage of the process are reflected in matrix form in Table 4.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sustainability Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the existing assessment models, methods, and criteria are mostly empirical, and built on numerous assumptions and hypotheses; manufacturing systems are viewed as black or grey boxes, and system performances are mainly evaluated based on system inputs and outputs, with the limited context of value-added and non-value-added manufacturing processes in systems [58]. Most models lack consistent data, reliable analysis methods, and user-friendly tools for decision makers to assess system performance in an understandable way [59]. The performance assessment methods fail to match advanced technologies to market demands in manufacturing [60].…”
Section: Limitations Of Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%