2005
DOI: 10.51400/2709-6998.2125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Grid-Based Gis Approach to Regional Flood Damage Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The component-based approach for assessing industrial flood vulnerability assessment is outlined in Figure 1. While traditional flood loss assessment methods (e.g., Kates, 1968;Penning-Rowsell and Chatterton, 1977;Su et al, 2005;Sangrey et al, 1975) and recent implementations such as Hazus (FEMA, 2021) involves the use of depthdamage curves to determine facility-level damage based on an input flood depth, the component-based approach here involves a three-phase process. In Phase 1, flood parameters are identified, and facility and construction information are collected and loaded into databases.…”
Section: Component-level Vulnerability Assessment Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The component-based approach for assessing industrial flood vulnerability assessment is outlined in Figure 1. While traditional flood loss assessment methods (e.g., Kates, 1968;Penning-Rowsell and Chatterton, 1977;Su et al, 2005;Sangrey et al, 1975) and recent implementations such as Hazus (FEMA, 2021) involves the use of depthdamage curves to determine facility-level damage based on an input flood depth, the component-based approach here involves a three-phase process. In Phase 1, flood parameters are identified, and facility and construction information are collected and loaded into databases.…”
Section: Component-level Vulnerability Assessment Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The component-based approach for assessing industrial flood vulnerability assessment is outlined in Figure 1. While traditional flood loss assessment methods (e.g., Kates, 1968;Sangrey et al, 1975;Penning-Rowsell and Chatterton, 1977;Su et al, 2005) and recent implementations such as Hazus (FEMA, 2021) involves the use of depth-damage curves to determine facility-level damage based on an input flood depth, the component-based approach here involves a three-phase process. In Phase 1, flood parameters are identified, and facility and construction information are collected and loaded into databases.…”
Section: Component-level Vulnerability Assessment Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of historical regions with multiple TSFs, it is not easy to undertake a comprehensive risk assessment, due to the high cost particularly for sampling and laboratory analysis. On the other hand, in recent years computer‐based flood mapping techniques have been proposed as a valuable approach to understanding and mitigating the potential effects of floods at local and regional scales (e.g., Gouldby et al, 2008; Lamb et al, 2010; Merz et al, 2007; Su et al, 2005). Therefore, the use of computer‐based flood mapping approaches can help to prioritise sites that warrant a comprehensive risk assessment that would include all three steps listed above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%