2007 Mobile Networking for Vehicular Environments 2007
DOI: 10.1109/move.2007.4300813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Group Signature Based Secure and Privacy-Preserving Vehicular Communication Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
108
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this model, revocation messages were only sent to signature verifiers (as opposed to both signers and verifiers). Other researchers extended the group-signature-based anonymous authentication scheme to achieve that any public entity will not reveal the originator identity of a routine traffic message [6], [7]. However, the cost for signing and verifying were quite high.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, revocation messages were only sent to signature verifiers (as opposed to both signers and verifiers). Other researchers extended the group-signature-based anonymous authentication scheme to achieve that any public entity will not reveal the originator identity of a routine traffic message [6], [7]. However, the cost for signing and verifying were quite high.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of them can address the security requirements well, such as authentication, nonrepudiation, identity revocation and conditional anonymity. In the group signature based schemes, utilizing group signature [17], any public entity won't reveal the originator identity of a routine traffic message [6,7]. However, one limitation that the cost for signing and verifying messages is far more than adopting traditional public key based signature.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these contributions [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] rely on a policy that grants trust to the RSU or the security center (also called authentication server) in the network not to trace the identity of a particular OBU (vehicle or driver) without a legal reason. Such policy threatens anonymity and may prevent drivers from joining the service.…”
Section: Previous and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%