1983
DOI: 10.1017/s0094837300007545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A guide for differentiating mammalian carnivore taxa responsible for gnaw damage to herbivore limb bones

Abstract: Large cats, canids, bears, and hyenas create distinctive types of damage when they gnaw bones. This paper describes the diagnostic characteristics of damage done by each taxon to femora and tibiae of herbivores whose body weights are 300 kg or more. Pleistocene and Recent fossil collections that include gnawed bones might provide data on the presence of carnivores whose own remains are not found in the collections. Information might also be gained about predator and scavenger utilization of prey carcasses, oft… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
267
1
36

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 430 publications
(318 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
14
267
1
36
Order By: Relevance
“…scavengers. Other possible explanations for the limited evidence of carnivore gnawing are a predominance of winter kills and/or high prey abundance (Haynes, 1982(Haynes, , 1983; however, these alternatives seem unlikely because in the region today caribou carcasses are converted into broad scatters of gnawed and shattered bones within several years of death. Some of these bones may persist for decades on the ground surface, but they persist as gnawed fragments, and this is not the condition of the majority of Pleistocene bones we find.…”
Section: Taphonomic Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…scavengers. Other possible explanations for the limited evidence of carnivore gnawing are a predominance of winter kills and/or high prey abundance (Haynes, 1982(Haynes, , 1983; however, these alternatives seem unlikely because in the region today caribou carcasses are converted into broad scatters of gnawed and shattered bones within several years of death. Some of these bones may persist for decades on the ground surface, but they persist as gnawed fragments, and this is not the condition of the majority of Pleistocene bones we find.…”
Section: Taphonomic Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various types of marks produced by carnivore teeth have been differentiated (pits, punctures, grooves, furrowing, crenulated edges and impact points), following the definitions by Haynes (1980Haynes ( , 1983, Binford (1981) and Sala (2012). The measurements were taken with electronic digital calipers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum number counts were based on summing the percentage of each anatomical landmark present for each individual element. The presence/absence of cut mark, percussion mark, tooth mark, tooth scoring, burning, abrasion/ trampling, rodent gnawing, and root etching data were recorded, in addition to the weathering stage of the bone surface and the bone surface condition (Behrensmeyer, 1978;Brain, 1981;Shipman, 1981;Haynes, 1983Haynes, , 1991Johnson, 1985;Davis, 1987;Blumenschine and Selvaggio, 1988;Potts, 1988;Lyman and Fox, 1989;Andrews, 1990;Capaldo and Blumenschine, 1994;Lyman, 1994a;Fisher, 1995;Capaldo, 1997;Reitz and Wing, 1999). Identifications of the bone surface marks were made using a 16 × hand lens.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%