2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A guided Bayesian inference approach for detection of multiple flaws in structures using the extended finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where x j represents the j -th sensing position with j D 1; 2; : : : ; N o ; N o is the total number of observations (sensing points); O u is the predicted displacement; and u is the measured displacement. To sum up, the basic idea is that flaws close to nearby sensors would have more pronounced effect compared with those of the pristine state, leading to large weighting coefficient values in these sensor locations [32].…”
Section: The Weighted Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where x j represents the j -th sensing position with j D 1; 2; : : : ; N o ; N o is the total number of observations (sensing points); O u is the predicted displacement; and u is the measured displacement. To sum up, the basic idea is that flaws close to nearby sensors would have more pronounced effect compared with those of the pristine state, leading to large weighting coefficient values in these sensor locations [32].…”
Section: The Weighted Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H. SUN, H. WAISMAN AND R. BETTI Equation (32) can be minimized using the damped Gauss-Newton algorithm proposed in Section 3.3. In this case, the entries of the Jacobian matrix can be determined in a close form by OEJ e k1 D 2x 0 .x 0 x k / 2 C .y 0 y k / 2 1 2 OEJ e k2 D 2y 0 .x 0 x k / 2 C .y 0 y k / 2 1 2 (33) which yields an admissible initial guess of the flaw position…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the standard FEM, the XFEM offers two superior capabilities: (i) a more accurate representation of fields in the vicinity of the crack tip singularity and (ii) alleviation of the need for costly re-meshing as the crack is propagating in the structure [25,26]. These favorable features have been exploited in [27,28,29,30,31] by combining XFEM and optimization algorithms for deterministic and probabilistic flaw detection in structures. In [31], the Bayesian approach [32,33,34,35] was used to quantify uncertainties from modeling errors and measurement noise, leading to the probability distributions of the flaw parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These favorable features have been exploited in [27,28,29,30,31] by combining XFEM and optimization algorithms for deterministic and probabilistic flaw detection in structures. In [31], the Bayesian approach [32,33,34,35] was used to quantify uncertainties from modeling errors and measurement noise, leading to the probability distributions of the flaw parameters. Since the extracted reflection intensity spectrum relies heavily on the accuracy of the strain field, we propose to use not only the leading, but also the higher-order terms of the Williams asymptotic solution [36] as the enrichment functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green 15 presented a Data Annealing-based MCMC algorithm for probabilistic system identification. Yan et al 16 investigated a reverse jump MCMC method for Bayesian updating of flaw parameters. Sun and Büyüköztürk proposed a MCMC approach with adaptive random-walk steps for probabilistic model updating of buildings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%