2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10910-015-0507-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Haar wavelet-finite difference hybrid method for the numerical solution of the modified Burgers’ equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After this achievement researchers have been using Haar wavelets to obtain numerical solutions of differential equations because of their simplicity and computational features. Recently, many authors have used Haar wavelet method for solving ordinary and partial differential equations [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Especially high order pdes like KdV and fractional coupled KdV equations are considered in [32,33].…”
Section: Haar Waveletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this achievement researchers have been using Haar wavelets to obtain numerical solutions of differential equations because of their simplicity and computational features. Recently, many authors have used Haar wavelet method for solving ordinary and partial differential equations [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Especially high order pdes like KdV and fractional coupled KdV equations are considered in [32,33].…”
Section: Haar Waveletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the number of relevant degrees of freedom is finite in truncated field computations. 7,8 While improved hardware and data-oriented strategies such as parallel computing have made great strides in the past few decades, memory costs and computational expenses associated with massively parallel uniform grid simulations represent a great motivation for utilizing adaptive grid strategies for complex physics exhibiting sharp gradients. Multiresolution techniques bridge the gap between both spectral and finite difference/volume approaches by providing a framework for the identification of high-frequency regions in the solution field through its hybrid behavior, ie, being localized in both space and scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 While improved hardware and data-oriented strategies such as parallel computing have made great strides in the past few decades, memory costs and computational expenses associated with massively parallel uniform grid simulations represent a great motivation for utilizing adaptive grid strategies for complex physics exhibiting sharp gradients. The high degree of localization makes the use of spectral methods inefficient since global expansion fails to represent the solution accurately at lower degrees of resolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haq et al in [11] formulated simple classical radial basis functions (RBFs) collocation method for the numerical solution of the non-linear dispersive and dissipative Burgers equation. Both Orac et al in [12] and Lepik in [13] investigated the numerical solutions using Haar wavelet. Inan and Bahadir described implicit exponential difference method in two cases: finite and fully finite [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take c 0 = 0.5 and β = 0.01. Table 3 shows the L ∞ errors by using CSC method and given methods in [9,12,15,16] for t = 2, 4 and 6 and N = 9 × 9. In Figures 8 and 9, we show the approximate solution and absolute error, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%