A Hardware-Software Design Framework for Distributed Cellular Computing

Abstract

Abstract. In this article, we describe a novel hardware-software design framework for prototyping cellular architectures in hardware. Based on an extensible platform of about 200 FPGAs, configured as a networked structure of processors, the hardware part of this computing framework is backed by an extensible library of software components that provides primitives for efficient inter-processor communication and distributed computation. This dual software-hardware approach allows a very quick exploration of different ways to solve computational problems using bio-inspired techniques. To demonstrate the validity of the method, we present an example of how a traditional parallel system such as a cellular automaton can be modeled and run with this perspective. In addition, we also show that the flexibility of our approach allows not only cellular automata but any computation to be easily implemented on a cellular substrate.

Roombots—Towards decentralized reconfiguration with self-reconfiguring modular robotic metamodules

“…This could benefit from a global clock, i.e. synchronized cycles of movements as described in [23]. Once a synchronization would be implemented, the overall setup becomes deterministic, at any crucial point in time (beginning of cycles) distances between metamodules are known, communicated, and a consensus could be made.…”

SABRE: a bio-inspired fault-tolerant electronic architecture

“…The transport triggered architecture (TTA) was created in the 1980's [11] and usually contains an instruction decoder, an interconnection network and a number of functional units (FUs), as shown in figure. 2 [12]. Functional units and the decoder are connected through data buses and address buses, a single data/address bus pair is called a slot, and a processor can have multiple slots to allow parallel processing to occur.…”

Roombots: Reconfigurable Robots for Adaptive Furniture

“…This could require a global clock, i.e. synchronized cycles of movements as described in [36]. Dead-locks at the assembly phase of a structure happen as a result of the (currently hand-coded and) non-optimized seeding order, and the orientation of the foot hemispheres of metamodules within the assembled structure.…”