1967
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.35.4.614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hemodynamic Study of Left Ventricular Aneurysm

Abstract: Thirteen patients with left ventricular aneurysm due to coronary heart disease were studied by left heart and coronary sinus catheterization, including cineventriculography and measurement of ventricular mechanics and energetics at rest, and in some subjects, during either isoproterenol infusion or supine leg exercise. Eight patients had an aneurysm estimated to comprise greater than 20% of the left ventricular surface area, associated with increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume and pressure and mean … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
60
1
3

Year Published

1968
1968
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
60
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both interobserver and intraobserver variability were also similar to beat-to-beat variability (figures 3 and 4). Significant differences were found at 14 chords: beat-to-beat variability was lower than interobserver variability at 6 chords in the anterior wall and at 4 Variability from study to study was considerably higher than between different observations in the same study (figures 3 and 4), even though heart rate, ejection fraction, and end-diastolic volume were similar in the two stud,ies (table 1). Variability averaged 1.06 ± 0.42 SF units (range 0.64 to 1.99) or 30.1 ± 13.3%o of normal motion (range 16.3% to 77.3%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Both interobserver and intraobserver variability were also similar to beat-to-beat variability (figures 3 and 4). Significant differences were found at 14 chords: beat-to-beat variability was lower than interobserver variability at 6 chords in the anterior wall and at 4 Variability from study to study was considerably higher than between different observations in the same study (figures 3 and 4), even though heart rate, ejection fraction, and end-diastolic volume were similar in the two stud,ies (table 1). Variability averaged 1.06 ± 0.42 SF units (range 0.64 to 1.99) or 30.1 ± 13.3%o of normal motion (range 16.3% to 77.3%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…15 Ventricular contraction was classified as follows'5: (1) The average rate of rise of isovolumic pressure was reduced in the 10 subjects in whom this could be analyzed. 16 The normal period of isovolumic contraction seen in two patients may possibly be explained by the unusually small rise in systolic pressure required by I.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Ventricular aneurysm as a pathological entity has been described in detail, but this is usually noted to be a thinned out and dilated scarred area of myocardium (21), without specific information about the actual elasticity of the walls of the aneurysm or pressure-volume relationships of the ventricle. On occasion in patients with ventricular aneurysm the ventricular volume may be normal or nearly so despite elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (22). In addition ventriculograms in such patients often show immobility or absence of motion rather than aneurysmal bulging during systole, suggesting that the ventricular wall may be relatively stiff and inelastic (22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On occasion in patients with ventricular aneurysm the ventricular volume may be normal or nearly so despite elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (22). In addition ventriculograms in such patients often show immobility or absence of motion rather than aneurysmal bulging during systole, suggesting that the ventricular wall may be relatively stiff and inelastic (22). However most of these clinical observations have been made in patients with chronic ischemic lesions, and may not be applicable to the early healing phase of myocardial infarction considered in the present investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%