Four types of variability affecting quantification of regional wall motion from contrast left ventriculograms (LVgrams) were studied. These included beat-to-beat variability in 24 LVgrams, intraobserver and interobserver variability in 20 LVgrams, and study-to-study variability in serial LVgrams of 21 patients with stable coronary artery disease. Motion was measured at 100 equidistant chords perpendicular to a center line drawn midway between the end-diastolic and end-systolic contours and normalized for heart size. Variability was computed as the absolute difference between observations. Beat-to-beat, intraobserver, and interobserver variability at the 100 chords were similar, averaging 14%, 14%, and 17%, respectively, of the mean motion in 64 patients with normal ventriculograms. Study-to-study variability was significantly higher, averaging 30% of mean normal motion, but was reduced when regional motion was calculated as the mean motion of chords within a region of interest. Variability peaked at the apex. Realignment to correct for cardiac rotation significantly increased variability. Investigators whose methods of wall motion analysis rely on identification of the apex as a landmark should be aware of this source of potential variability and error. Circulation 68, No. 3, 550-559, 1983. IT HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN that coronary artery stenosis results in abnormal regional left ventricular wall motion. ' Early studies in which wall motion was gauged subjectively were hampered by large interobserver variability that resulted in poor reproducibility of results.2-More recently, quantitative methods of measuring regional wall motion have been developed. With these methods, wall motion abnormalities in patients with coronary artery and valvular disease have been measured and related to the site and severity of coronary disease, to the amount of fibrosis in infarcted myocardium, and to the development of congestive heart failure.5'-' The reproducibility or variability in motion measurements by the various quantitative methods, however, has not yet been determined. Knowledge of variability is necessary to gauge the significance of measured abnormalities in wall motion and of changes observed in serial studies performed to assess progression of disease or response to a therapeutic intervention. Therefore, our study was performed to determine