Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, 2004. IRI 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/iri.2004.1431527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A heuristic approach for best sets of actions determination in influence nets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SAF algorithm [28,29] is a heuristic approach to determine the sets of actions (and their configuration/state) that cause the probability of the desired effect to be above (below) a given probability threshold. The algorithm achieves this task in significantly less time than is required for an exhaustive examination of the actions' search space, which is exponential in terms of Given A, E where A = Set of Actionable Events E = Desired Effect…”
Section: Tools To Gauge Impact Of Changes In Insmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAF algorithm [28,29] is a heuristic approach to determine the sets of actions (and their configuration/state) that cause the probability of the desired effect to be above (below) a given probability threshold. The algorithm achieves this task in significantly less time than is required for an exhaustive examination of the actions' search space, which is exponential in terms of Given A, E where A = Set of Actionable Events E = Desired Effect…”
Section: Tools To Gauge Impact Of Changes In Insmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BNs have trouble with the often intractable task of knowledge elicitation for conditional probabilities. To overcome this limitation, INs use causal strengths (CAST) logic as a knowledge acquisition interface for eliciting conditional probability tables [18].…”
Section: Influence Netmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help decide on the triggered nodes, as Haider [18] suggested, concepts could be arranged in rows according to their degrees of contribution to main effect values by examining one concept value's change to 1 from 0, 1 where the other concept values stay the same. To accomplish this, the sample scenario values are determined using Configuration 5 (without taking the possibility effect into consideration) for 800 days, and main effect values are obtained.…”
Section: Defining the Concept Contributions By Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] Wagenhals and his team [3] introduced the time structure in IN modeling, which is called timed influence nets. [4] TIN has been widely used for Effects-based Operations that mainly for the evaluation of operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%