2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hierarchical approach to multi-class fuzzy classifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hierarchical tuning requires the definition of conditions for modification of the primary rules, as well as the selection of the modified candidate rules [4,5]. For this purpose, models of linguistic modifiers are developed.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hierarchical tuning requires the definition of conditions for modification of the primary rules, as well as the selection of the modified candidate rules [4,5]. For this purpose, models of linguistic modifiers are developed.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By so doing, the hybrid fuzzy-PID is capable of controlling the CPS under varying environmental conditions. To increase the transparency of the hybrid fuzzy-PID control, the fuzzy rules are here optimized by resorting to a grid-type fuzzy partitioning approach [24], [26]- [29], where the fuzzy sets and the fuzzy rules are learnt from examples of input variables and optimal control settings.…”
Section: Measured Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show the effect of the environmental variable The rules of the FLC are learnt by resorting to a grid-type fuzzy partitioning approach, as illustrated in the next subsection [24], [26]- [29], [32]. fuzzy partitioning approach can be used to learn the fuzzy rules from the numerical data of the sampled input-output data pairs [26], [29], [32]. The objective of the grid-type fuzzy partitioning approach is to separate the input-output feature space into a set of uniform or non-uniform grids with predefined membership functions, and, then, to obtain the most transparent fuzzy rules linking the antecedents and consequents of the available examples.…”
Section: A System Properties Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy values over 97% were reported with this technique in experiments over the Indian subcontinent, both in cloud detection over land and sea cases. On the other hand, in [74], a hierarchical approach for classification based on fuzzy rules was proposed. The main parameters of the proposed method were optimized by means of a GA, conforming a genetic fuzzy system.…”
Section: Classification Problems and Algorithms In Alternative Re Appmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem Specific Methodology Used [52] 2015 Power disturbance Classification SVM [53] 2013 Power disturbance Classification DT, ANN, neuro-fuzzy, SVM [54] 2014 Power disturbance Classification DT, SVM [55] 2014 Power disturbance Classification DT [56] 2012 Power disturbance Classification DT, DE [57] 2004 Power disturbance Classification Fuzzy expert, ANN [58] 2010 Power disturbance Classification Fuzzy classifiers [59] 2010 Power disturbance Classification GFS [48] 2006 Appliance load monitoring Classification ANN [60] 2009 Appliance load monitoring Classification k-NN, DTs, naive Bayes [61] 2010 Appliance load monitoring Classification k-NN, DTs, naive Bayes [62,63] 2010 Appliance load monitoring Classification LR, ANN [64] 2012 Appliance load monitoring Classification SVM [65] 2013 Solar Classification, regression SVM, ANN, ANFIS, wavelet, GA [66] 2008 Solar Classification, regression ANN, fuzzy systems, meta-heuristics [67] 2004 Solar Classification PNN [68] 2006 Solar Classification PNN [69] 2009 Solar Classification PNN, SOM, SVM [70] 2004 Solar Classification SVM [71] 2014 Solar Classification SVM [72] 2015 Solar Classification SVM [73] 2006 Solar Classification Fuzzy rules [74] 2013 Solar Classification Fuzzy classifiers [75] 2014 Solar Classification Fuzzy rules…”
Section: Ref Year Application Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%