2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-021-00417-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hierarchical deep learning approach with transparency and interpretability based on small samples for glaucoma diagnosis

Abstract: The application of deep learning algorithms for medical diagnosis in the real world faces challenges with transparency and interpretability. The labeling of large-scale samples leads to costly investment in developing deep learning algorithms. The application of human prior knowledge is an effective way to solve these problems. Previously, we developed a deep learning system for glaucoma diagnosis based on a large number of samples that had high sensitivity and specificity. However, it is a black box and the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The validation set of this study is a subset randomly selected from the extensive sample dataset of our previous study [ 22 ], including 500 cross-sectional (one image per patient at every time point) fundus images of glaucoma and 500 cross-sectional fundus images of normal eyes from Beijing Tongren Hospital. Eyes were diagnosed with glaucoma if there were both glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) and glaucomatous VF defects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The validation set of this study is a subset randomly selected from the extensive sample dataset of our previous study [ 22 ], including 500 cross-sectional (one image per patient at every time point) fundus images of glaucoma and 500 cross-sectional fundus images of normal eyes from Beijing Tongren Hospital. Eyes were diagnosed with glaucoma if there were both glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) and glaucomatous VF defects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glaucomatous VF loss was diagnosed if any of the following findings were evident on two consecutive VF tests: a glaucoma hemifield test outside normal limits, pattern standard deviation (PSD) < 5%, or a cluster of three or more nonedged points in typical glaucomatous locations, all depressed on the pattern deviation plot at a level of p < 0.05, with one point in the cluster depressed at a level of p < 0.01 [ 23 ]. According to the diagnosis results of these fundus images by the AI system [ 22 ], the verification set contains 480 true positives, 20 false negatives, 460 true negatives, and 40 false positives. The entire validation set was randomly divided into five groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [105], the authors developed a hierarchical deep learning system (HDLS) using 1791 fundus photographs for glaucoma diagnosis. Its recognition accuracy was 53% for the optic cup, 12% for the optic disc, and 16% for retinal nerve fiber layer defects.…”
Section: Segmentation Of the Outer Limits Of The Optic Disc And The Excavation By Detecting Glaucomatous Features Of The Papillamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DL has been often applied in the detection of glaucoma. There have been many reports of the use of AI in the diagnosis via structural changes, including retinal fundus photos ( 6 11 ) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) ( 12 14 ). Previous studies have focused on function changes as well as VF ( 15 18 ) loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%