2009 11th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing 2009
DOI: 10.1109/synasc.2009.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hierarchy of Tractable Subclasses for SAT and Counting SAT Problems

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results regarding fragments of propositional logic that exhibit milder complexity for one of the two problems is also prevalent in the literature, e. g., in (Pretolani, 1996) it is analyzed how to extend tractable classes of SAT. In (Andrei et al, 2009) the complexity of both problems are studied when clauses are (not) related (literals appearing positive and negative in different clauses). Also the optimization problem, MaxSAT, has been studied in detail.…”
Section: Related Complexity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results regarding fragments of propositional logic that exhibit milder complexity for one of the two problems is also prevalent in the literature, e. g., in (Pretolani, 1996) it is analyzed how to extend tractable classes of SAT. In (Andrei et al, 2009) the complexity of both problems are studied when clauses are (not) related (literals appearing positive and negative in different clauses). Also the optimization problem, MaxSAT, has been studied in detail.…”
Section: Related Complexity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%