2021
DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01017-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A High-Content Microscopy Screening Identifies New Genes Involved in Cell Width Control in Bacillus subtilis

Abstract: Bacterial shape is primarily dictated by the external cell wall, a vital structure that, as such, is the target of countless antibiotics. Our understanding of how bacteria synthesize and maintain this structure is therefore a cardinal question for both basic and applied research.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…subtilis across the cell cycle and growth conditions (63) facilitates correction for membrane curvature. Second, Gram-positive bacteria lack an outer membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…subtilis across the cell cycle and growth conditions (63) facilitates correction for membrane curvature. Second, Gram-positive bacteria lack an outer membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since antibiotic dilution predominantly depends on cell width ( equation 5 ), a central question is how width is determined ( 36 38 ) and how fast width is remodeled in response to antibiotic treatments. During steady-state growth, cell width is one of the most tightly controlled cellular parameters in both E. coli and B. subtilis ( 39 , 40 ) such that fluctuations in width are restored within 4 to 5 generations ( 17 ), commensurate with the typical time necessary for bacterial width remodeling ( 41 ). Under non-steady-state conditions, the cell width reaches a new equilibrium only within a few generations after nutrient shifts ( 42 ) or antibiotic exposure ( 15 , 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the mRNA counts achieved for S. aureus biofilm are less than those reported for another widely studied gram-positive pathogen, Bacillus subtilis, where 200-300 mRNA reads per cell were captured during planktonic growth, 20,22 this discrepancy can be explained by its larger cell volume (~4-6X) compared to S. aureus. [41][42][43] Studies from eukaryotic scRNA-seq have established that low-coverage sequencing is sufficient to fully capture sample heterogeneity within a large number of cells. [44][45][46][47] Quality control measures throughout the BaSSSh-seq process are presented in the Methods and Figure S1B-E.…”
Section: Basssh-seq Enables Bacterial Scrna-seq Of Biofilm and Incorp...mentioning
confidence: 99%