2013
DOI: 10.1093/ijlct/ctt031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high-efficiency solar Rankine engine with isothermal expansion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cascading multiple cycles would give better energy recovery than single closed or open cycles; however, the open cycle is the most applicable. For an operating pressure of 10 bar, the potential performance of the liquid nitrogen open cycle cryogenic engine can have an ideal efficiency of 19% and specific work of 200 kJ/kg; but this performance is quite low in comparison to the 27% ideal efficiency predicted for a surface heated engine operating on steam with similar pressure [44], and the reported 318 kJ/kg specific work achieved for a real surface heated (steam jacketed) engine operated at 5 bar [43]. Furthermore, unlike the surface heated engine, although the cryogenic engine has the advantage of not losing heat to the ambient (since it can be at the same or even lower temperature potential with the ambient), it could suffer evaporative losses and safety (explosion) risks at the storage tank; as it slowly absorbs heat from the ambient, which could result to excessive pressure rise [72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cascading multiple cycles would give better energy recovery than single closed or open cycles; however, the open cycle is the most applicable. For an operating pressure of 10 bar, the potential performance of the liquid nitrogen open cycle cryogenic engine can have an ideal efficiency of 19% and specific work of 200 kJ/kg; but this performance is quite low in comparison to the 27% ideal efficiency predicted for a surface heated engine operating on steam with similar pressure [44], and the reported 318 kJ/kg specific work achieved for a real surface heated (steam jacketed) engine operated at 5 bar [43]. Furthermore, unlike the surface heated engine, although the cryogenic engine has the advantage of not losing heat to the ambient (since it can be at the same or even lower temperature potential with the ambient), it could suffer evaporative losses and safety (explosion) risks at the storage tank; as it slowly absorbs heat from the ambient, which could result to excessive pressure rise [72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The speed of heat transfer is a limiting factor in the steam jacket design, but for certain applications speed is not considered critical. Igobo and Davies [44] proposed to use a slow-moving machine to drive a high pressure reverse osmosis process for desalination that works on a cycle time of the order of minutes. In this case, it was proposed to eliminate the traditional boiler (evaporator) of the steam engine and rely on the jacket (which may be thermal oil fed) alone for heat transfer to vaporise the working fluid and to maintain quasi-isothermal expansion.…”
Section: Surface Heated Boiler-less Rankine Enginementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For ease of calculation it is nonetheless assumed to be isothermal. A similar study was performed using a hot oil jacket surrounding the power cylinder leading to the following expression for efficiency [17].…”
Section: Fig2 T-s Diagram Of For the Concept Of The Isothermal Rankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system required a starting driving force of 28 kN for a 200 mm bore power cylinder and a cycle time of about 4 minutes. Igobo and Davies [13] reported a water/steam Rankine cycle power cylinder with isothermal expansion operated at cylinder wall temperature of 240 o C; the study indicated output force of up to 13 kN for 100 mm bore cylinder, and it was concluded that the isothermal Rankine cycle engine can be easily scaled-up to drive DesaLink. The isothermal expansion was preferred over the conventional adiabatic (isentropic) expansion for higher thermal efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%