2010
DOI: 10.1109/tvlsi.2009.2013629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A High-Performance Three-Engine Architecture for H.264/AVC Fractional Motion Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing this work with [8], the S&IS uses a lower area, however it uses a larger number of memory bits. Our architecture can also reach real time when processing QFHD videos while [8] can only process 7.5 frames per second in the same resolution.…”
Section: Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparing this work with [8], the S&IS uses a lower area, however it uses a larger number of memory bits. Our architecture can also reach real time when processing QFHD videos while [8] can only process 7.5 frames per second in the same resolution.…”
Section: Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Table 2 also presents comparisons with related works. This work was compared with the works [6], [8], [10], [11], [12], [13] and [14], presented in section 2. Table 2 presents the following parameters: (1) the technology, (2) the maximum operation frequency reached, (3) consumed area, (4) used memory bits, (5) cycles used per block, (6) reached frames per second for Full HD videos, (7) reached frames per second for QFHDvideo and (8) the power consumption.…”
Section: Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the expected cycle of the IME operation for an LCU is approximately 4,096 with a marginal PSNR drop of 0.005 dB when the IME of [8] is used. Meanwhile, the FME in [9] uses 16-pixel-width interpolators and can process an MB in 790 cycles, whereas the FME in [10] adopts multiple interpolators and the FME operation time is 631 cycles. The gate counts are 311 K and 321 K for FMEs in [9] and [10], respectively.…”
Section: Hardware Organization For An Hevc Encodermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the FME in [9] uses 16-pixel-width interpolators and can process an MB in 790 cycles, whereas the FME in [10] adopts multiple interpolators and the FME operation time is 631 cycles. The gate counts are 311 K and 321 K for FMEs in [9] and [10], respectively. In both FMEs, the mode reduction schemes are not applied to avoid PSNR degradation.…”
Section: Hardware Organization For An Hevc Encodermentioning
confidence: 99%