2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A high signal-to-noise ratio toroidal electron spectrometer for the SEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This happens because, as the specimen becomes more negative, low energy secondaries are deflected upwards by accelerating sample fields, causing some electrons to be pulled away from the analyzer entrance slit, as illustrated in Figure 1b, and some (smaller angle) electrons, to be pulled into the analyzer. These analyzer signals are very different than the ones obtained for V S = V C1 (field free region above the specimen), as shown in Figure 2b, where the SE analyzer signal shifts to the right, but grows significantly in height, similar to the results reported previously by Hoang et al (2011). This is because these electrons go into the analyzer at steeper entrance angles than the previous ones (absence of specimen fields), and they as a result, strike the analyzer deflector plates, and do not contribute to the SE signal output.…”
Section: Experimental Analyzer Se Signals In Presence Of Specimen Fieldssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This happens because, as the specimen becomes more negative, low energy secondaries are deflected upwards by accelerating sample fields, causing some electrons to be pulled away from the analyzer entrance slit, as illustrated in Figure 1b, and some (smaller angle) electrons, to be pulled into the analyzer. These analyzer signals are very different than the ones obtained for V S = V C1 (field free region above the specimen), as shown in Figure 2b, where the SE analyzer signal shifts to the right, but grows significantly in height, similar to the results reported previously by Hoang et al (2011). This is because these electrons go into the analyzer at steeper entrance angles than the previous ones (absence of specimen fields), and they as a result, strike the analyzer deflector plates, and do not contribute to the SE signal output.…”
Section: Experimental Analyzer Se Signals In Presence Of Specimen Fieldssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The Rau and Robinson toroidal analyzer has first-order focusing charcteristics and requires multi-channel detection in the azimuthal angular direction. Initial results from a prototype of this analyzer were reported subsequently by Hoang et al (2011), demonstrating that the analyzer has an inherently high signal-to-noise capability, able to detect specimen voltage changes well into the sub-mV region. Initial results from a prototype of this analyzer were reported subsequently by Hoang et al (2011), demonstrating that the analyzer has an inherently high signal-to-noise capability, able to detect specimen voltage changes well into the sub-mV region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SE energy filtering in SEM has been widely used for many applications. In general, this method can be used as a technique for spectroscopy of low-energy secondary electrons emitted from many different materials [6,7] and for observing atomically thin films on metal substrates [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoang et al recently reported a way to further enhance the signal-to-noise performance of the toroidal SE energy analyzer [13]. This technique is based upon creating an acceleration field at the entrance of the analyzer, which acts to pull in wider angle low energy secondaries into the analyzer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%