2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:catl.0000038571.97121.b7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Highly Efficient Catalyst Au/MCM-41 for Selective Oxidation Cyclohexane Using Oxygen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…179,186 The total selectivities for KA oil were very high and nearly constant regardless of the conversion; the selectivities were as high as µ99% for smaller 0.2Au n /HAP (n = 1039), whereas the selectivity was slightly smaller (µ95%) for 0.2Au µ85 /HAP. This is in sharp contrast to the previously reported trade-off relationship between conversion and selectivity 181,185 Figure 21 shows a plot of the TOF values (defined as the number of cyclohexane converted per Au atom in the cluster per hour) as a function of cluster size n. The TOF values increase monotonically with increasing size in the range n = 10 to 39, but decrease in the range n = 39 to µ85. Figure 21 reveals that there is an optimal Au cluster size in the range n = 40 to 80 for aerobic oxidation of cyclohexane.…”
Section: Catalysis For Aerobic Oxidation Of Cyclohexanecontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…179,186 The total selectivities for KA oil were very high and nearly constant regardless of the conversion; the selectivities were as high as µ99% for smaller 0.2Au n /HAP (n = 1039), whereas the selectivity was slightly smaller (µ95%) for 0.2Au µ85 /HAP. This is in sharp contrast to the previously reported trade-off relationship between conversion and selectivity 181,185 Figure 21 shows a plot of the TOF values (defined as the number of cyclohexane converted per Au atom in the cluster per hour) as a function of cluster size n. The TOF values increase monotonically with increasing size in the range n = 10 to 39, but decrease in the range n = 39 to µ85. Figure 21 reveals that there is an optimal Au cluster size in the range n = 40 to 80 for aerobic oxidation of cyclohexane.…”
Section: Catalysis For Aerobic Oxidation Of Cyclohexanecontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The nano-structured Au@TiO 2 / MCM-22 (PR) exhibits extremely higher TOF than the reported gold catalysts [21] [39] [40]. Experiment results also show that the TOF become higher with a decrease in the amount of Au (Table 4).…”
Section: Catalytic Oxidation Of Cyclohexanementioning
confidence: 80%
“…The industrial scale production of KA oil was carried out in twoconsecutive-step process: the noncatalytic autoxidation of cyclohexane to cyclohexyl hydroperoxide (CHHP) in the presence of oxygen, followed by the conversion CHHP to KA oil using a homogeneous cobalt (Co(II)) catalyst. This process has limitations of low cyclohexane conversion of 3-4% with selectivity of 60-70% to CHHP [13], high operation cost of recycling of unreacted cyclohexane, partial recovery of Co(II) catalyst due to its easy discharge with the salts leaving the process, and use of 180 Kg of NaOH to produce a single Kg of KA oil; this in turn generates 1100 Kg of alkaline waste [14]. The environmental and economical shortcomings of the industrial scale selective oxidation of cyclohexane to KA oil were reduced by using a heterogeneous catalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, most of these catalysts have been utilized in the presence of a solvent [15,16] and an expensive oxidant [17]. Several catalytic systems, such as FeRu, FeCo nanoclusters, supported Co catalyst, polymer supported cobaltous palmitate, and Co-salen complex immobilized on silica [18], Au/MCM-41 [13], gold nanoparticles immobilized upon mesoporous silica [19], Au nanoclusters on hydroxyapatite [17], metallophthalocyanines supported on -alumina [20], and chromium containing silicate [21], have been devised in solvent-free condition and presence of molecular oxygen. These catalysts in general have limitations of poor catalytic activity, loss of sensitivity, low selectivity, and high cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%