2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have not found any literature on large head metal on metal THA, and the effect of head size on pain and elevated ion levels. Larger diameter heads lubricates better [17], which might be the reason why these heads results in lower ion levels, and less risk of revision with RTHA. In addition small head RTHA are also prone to higher risk of impingement, which might result in higher revision rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have not found any literature on large head metal on metal THA, and the effect of head size on pain and elevated ion levels. Larger diameter heads lubricates better [17], which might be the reason why these heads results in lower ion levels, and less risk of revision with RTHA. In addition small head RTHA are also prone to higher risk of impingement, which might result in higher revision rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] According to a presentation Professor Graves gave at a meeting in Glasgow, the Australian joint registry warned the Australian regulators and DePuy 17 times about problems with the ASR between 2007 and 2009.…”
Section: Registry Data Also Dismissedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the study by Fisher et al [43] was to [39] tested joints of 36 mm diameter with low-and high-carbon components in wrought or cast forms.…”
Section: Friction and Lubricationmentioning
confidence: 99%