2022
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2022.3186657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Holistic Evaluation of Buried Power Rails and Back-Side Power for Sub-5 nm Technology Nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Scaled cell heights stalemated the frontside power and ground (PG) rails at the standard cell boundaries, where the PG rails were deeply scaled, since highly resistive (e.g. 900 Ω/µm) 4 but still relatively wider than their routing track counterparts. Overall, the less number of routing resources and highly resistive PG rails were significantly derating the design Quality of Results metrics, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Scaled cell heights stalemated the frontside power and ground (PG) rails at the standard cell boundaries, where the PG rails were deeply scaled, since highly resistive (e.g. 900 Ω/µm) 4 but still relatively wider than their routing track counterparts. Overall, the less number of routing resources and highly resistive PG rails were significantly derating the design Quality of Results metrics, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the routing congestion rate and the IR drop level. 4 Under the aforementioned circumstances, the BSPDN concept has been proposed 5,6 to further boost the logic scaling by relieving the available routing track resources, as well as to leverage the usage of wider pitched, hence lower resistance backside metal rails. Since its proposal, the BSPDN concept has gained attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%