2011
DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2011.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid multiple attribute decision making method for solving problems of industrial environment

Abstract: The selection of appropriate alternative in the industrial environment is an important but, at the same time, a complex and difficult problem because of the availability of a wide range of alternatives and similarity among them. Therefore, there is a need for simple, systematic, and logical methods or mathematical tools to guide decision makers in considering a number of selection attributes and their interrelations. In this paper, a hybrid decision making method of graph theory and matrix approach (GTMA) and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve total quality management (TQM) in India, Kulkarni 7 applies GTMA for the performance evaluation problem in the context. Singh and Rao 8 name the approach which involves the application of GTMA with AHP as 'the hybrid MADM method' (i.e. 'AHGTMA', or alternatively 'AHP-GTMA' here).…”
Section: Methods: a Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve total quality management (TQM) in India, Kulkarni 7 applies GTMA for the performance evaluation problem in the context. Singh and Rao 8 name the approach which involves the application of GTMA with AHP as 'the hybrid MADM method' (i.e. 'AHGTMA', or alternatively 'AHP-GTMA' here).…”
Section: Methods: a Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using linear normalization for this method, the decision matrix will transform into the following (Rao, 2007;Singh & Rao, 2011).…”
Section: Proposed Method: Polygons Area Method(pam)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual data was provided by the manufactures (Rao, 2007(Rao, , 2013. Karasak and Ahiska (2005), Rao (2007Rao ( , 2013, Wang and Chin (2009), Singh and Rao (2011), and Mondala and Chakraborty (2013 solved this example using MCDM methods. The decision matrix with twelve alternative robots and five attributes is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Robot Selection For Supporting Nc Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Singh & Rao, 2011;Tulsian & Saini, 2014). Hansen et al (2009) also highlighted that innovation is one of the most important variables that has an effect on SCP.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%