2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hybrid of Random Forest and Deep Auto-Encoder with support vector regression methods for accuracy improvement and uncertainty reduction of long-term streamflow prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RFs are appealing for a multitude of reasons, including their predictive performance, robustness, speed, nonparametric nature, stability, diagnosis of variable importance, as well as their ability to handle nonlinearity, interactions, noise, and small sample sizes in forcing data (Tyralis et al., 2019). RFs are being used in a variety of applications including water resources and water quality modeling (Suchetana et al., 2017), construction safety risk (Tixier et al., 2016), and used with success in recent years for flow forecasting, primarily at daily and monthly time scales (Abbasi et al., 2021; Al‐Juboori, 2019; Ghorbani et al., 2020; Hussain & Khan, 2020; Li et al., 2019; Liang et al., 2018; Muñoz et al., 2018; Papacharalampous & Tyralis, 2018; Pham et al., 2020).…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RFs are appealing for a multitude of reasons, including their predictive performance, robustness, speed, nonparametric nature, stability, diagnosis of variable importance, as well as their ability to handle nonlinearity, interactions, noise, and small sample sizes in forcing data (Tyralis et al., 2019). RFs are being used in a variety of applications including water resources and water quality modeling (Suchetana et al., 2017), construction safety risk (Tixier et al., 2016), and used with success in recent years for flow forecasting, primarily at daily and monthly time scales (Abbasi et al., 2021; Al‐Juboori, 2019; Ghorbani et al., 2020; Hussain & Khan, 2020; Li et al., 2019; Liang et al., 2018; Muñoz et al., 2018; Papacharalampous & Tyralis, 2018; Pham et al., 2020).…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Autoencoder (AE) [ 21 ] and Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) networks [ 22 ] are such deep learning algorithms. Because of this, some researchers [ 23 , 24 ] adopted AE networks to compress high-dimensional hydrological time series to obtain low-dimensional representations and generate predictions based on low-dimensional representations. Besides, others researchers [ 25 – 27 ] exploited the SAE network to extract features from hydrological time series and generate predictions based on the extracted features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous data-driven models, which have been used for time series forecasting like Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) (Abbasi et al 2021), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) (Modaresi et al 2018), and Arti cial Neural Networks (ANN) (Khazaee Poul et al 2019). The mentioned models are the classic Data-Driven Forecasting Frameworks (DDFF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%