2021 IEEE 11th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/ccwc51732.2021.9376007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid Probabilistic Ensemble based Extreme Gradient Boosting Approach For Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, using feature selection strategies, the majority of previous studies randomly picked a specified number of features. For example, Bharti et al [65] applied ML classifiers with ten statistically significant features based on p-values, Inan et al [37] proposed to use most significant top twelve features, Danaei et al [29] had acquired best accuracy employing 28 features selected using Random Forest embedded feature selection technique and so on. However, hardly any study has investigated at how changing the numbers and combinations of features selected using that same feature selection method can affect the prediction result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, using feature selection strategies, the majority of previous studies randomly picked a specified number of features. For example, Bharti et al [65] applied ML classifiers with ten statistically significant features based on p-values, Inan et al [37] proposed to use most significant top twelve features, Danaei et al [29] had acquired best accuracy employing 28 features selected using Random Forest embedded feature selection technique and so on. However, hardly any study has investigated at how changing the numbers and combinations of features selected using that same feature selection method can affect the prediction result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Chandrasekar et al [84] , Bahad et al [85] , Deif et al [86] eXtreme Gradient (XG) Boosting This approach is scalable and efficient form of gradient boosting that improves on two fronts: tree construction speed and a novel distributed algorithm for tree searches [87] Heart disease detection, chronic kidney disease diagnosis, breast cancer detection etc. Ashish et al [88] , Ogunleye et al [89] , Inan et al [90] Adaptive Boosting classifier It's an adaptive classifier that leverages the results of various weak learning algorithms to substantially enhance performance and provide an effective predictor for the boosted classifier's final output [91] Endometrial cancer prediction, Hepatitis disease detection, cancer classification etc. Wang et al [92] , Akbar et al [93] , Lu et al [94] Categorical Gradient (CAT) Boosting It is an implementation of Gradient Boost classifier that employs ordered boosting with categorical features and uses binary decision trees as underlying predictors [95] Parkinson's disease prediction, COVID-19 detection from blood samples, diabetes risk prediction etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Feature selection techniques Ref Sequential backward selection (SBS) [37] Pearson method [37] Random Forest embedded feat. selection [37] Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) [38] , [54] Chi-Square feature selection [38] , [56] Forward Selection & Backward Elimination Technique [38] Genetic Algorithm [51] Decision Tree [52] Filter Method [53] Univariate Feature Selection Method [54] Statistical Analysis (t-test) [55] Analysis of variance (ANOVA) Test [56] , [59] Neural Fuzzy Rough Set (NFRS) & Artificial Neural Network (ANN) [57] Correlation based Feature Selection (CFS) [57] Principal Component Analysis (PCA) [57] , [58]
Figure 11 Ven Diagram of applied research methodologies.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inan et al [7], evaluated the synthetic minority oversampling technique for optimization of the XGBoost model for breast cancer diagnosis. The study developed the XGBoost with a dataset collected from the UCI repository.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%