38th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit 2008
DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-3853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Hybrid RANS/LES Approach to Modeling of Swirling Jet Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A generalized subgrid scale methodology for variable density flow is discussed in the literature, and shown to have excellent agreement with DNS [Moin, 1991]. Hybrid RANS/LES approaches have recently shown promising results [Stoellinger and Zemtsop, 2007;Chenoweth et al, 2008;Kannepalli et al, 2008;Gopalan et al, 2010].…”
Section: Dynamic Smagorinsky Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A generalized subgrid scale methodology for variable density flow is discussed in the literature, and shown to have excellent agreement with DNS [Moin, 1991]. Hybrid RANS/LES approaches have recently shown promising results [Stoellinger and Zemtsop, 2007;Chenoweth et al, 2008;Kannepalli et al, 2008;Gopalan et al, 2010].…”
Section: Dynamic Smagorinsky Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RST model performed much better but was computational expensive[65].A RANS/LES model (combination of a RANS model and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) model) was used to simulate flow with a small swirl number. Results indicated that the length scales governing the swirl and axial velocity were different and simulations would be more accurate if they could cover a large range of mixing length scales[66].Recent numerical studies of supersonic flow or interior scramjet flow field simulations have used k-ε, k-ω turbulence models or combinations of both. Numerical investigation of scramjet combustors with combustion conducted by Vyas (2010)[7] and Tourani (2011)[67] used a k-ε turbulence,Mack (2006) [38] andJianwen (2008) [68] used a k-ω turbulence model whileRodriguez (2005) [61] andBhagwandin (2009) [69] used Mentor's SST k-ω turbulence model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%